Dufus said:
As in all shooting situations whether it be target or SD, what difference does it make if you can't hit what you are aiming at.
I shoot long range and I strongly believe that it make for a much better marksman at any range.
Possibly.
There's nothing wrong with shooting at long range, and you should, of course, continue shooting as you think best. That said, however, I'm not sure that the skills needed to be a good long-distance shooter (or even an effective Bullseye shooter) broadly overlap with the skills and techniques needed for effective at closer-ranges
in a true self-defense situation.
When shooting at targets that are far away -- getting into the proper position, controlling your breathing, slowly squeezing off each shot, just taking your time -- is very important -- as is avoiding caffeine that day and maybe even the day before
)).
But when the target is "up close and personal," when you are forced to shoot while moving, when you're trying to get a companion out of the line of fire, when the target is also moving and shooting at you, what you need to do is quite different -- and that seldom includes taking your time. Then, too, shooting from awkward positions or from behind cover or barriers arguably calls for different skills and a different kind of practice -- and maybe mindset.
The legal ramifications of taking shots at those longer distances can be hard to appreciate, and self-defense may be harder to proove. If the target (my opponent) is 50-100 yards away, I'm going to try to get out of Dodge, or find better cover (which might give me some much-needed TIME!)