gunstocarry is actually very accurate for DC. it thankfully doesn't include the FUD from Lott on his absurd contention on carry being prohibited 1,000 feet from a school, which I have had three separate firearms related criminal law attorneys say Lott is wrong on.
indeed, even beyond code there are readouts/'advisory opinions from states' attorney generals that are not in code, not as good as a uppr court ruling precedent, but usable as part of defense. EG Virginia's attorney generals readouts on what secured means and whether glove compartment needs to be locked for a gun to be "secured" with AG published opinion that it did not being reinforced by a court opinion But in a different state the same code language could be held to mean locked.
Someone above mentioned that in the back, beyond the driver's reach, is good enough. That's NOT good enough to satisfy the FOPA, so it isn't good enough to satisfy any state or local law that's based on or similar to the FOPA. I'm sorry for harping on this, but with all the gun laws out there it's just NOT something that has a simple answer.
indeed, even beyond code there are readouts/'advisory opinions from states' attorney generals that are not in code, not as good as a uppr court ruling precedent, but usable as part of defense. EG Virginia's attorney generals readouts on what secured means and whether glove compartment needs to be locked for a gun to be "secured" with AG published opinion that it did not being reinforced by a court opinion But in a different state the same code language could be held to mean locked.