No - I didnt know he had a weapon at all... I was hit and down before I knew what
happened. He was 100% with that one shot - yes. But thats all he got.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Had you not been wearing a vest it would have been enough. His performance no matter how obtained was pretty good. It was MORE than enough. Your vest had no part on his perfomance. "Down before you knew what happened." Yup. that's how it works. No time for conflict management or verbal judo.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Considering he fired that round over his shoulder while running away from me - I think it was a fluke he hit me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Flukes are damned deadly. Can you recall mentions of "Murphys's law?" Well you got O'Toole's law that says, " Murphy was an optimist." That is how it works in the real world. I' working on an "Anti-O'Toole Law drill." The same flukes work for you. It doesn't matter how you win..just win. Leave the formal organized efforts for the target shooters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.
Most people think that too.
My stance when I returned fire? I was on my back, I braced my pistol along the side of my right leg. 30 meters, low light, just been centerpunched, scored two hits which put the BG down. I think it was not a bad performance on my part... but thats just me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Performance?" I think it was a FLUKE. How can we claim the bad guys have flukes and we don't? We seem to credit thier performance to luck and flukes and ours to some form of background training.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I hope you dont add that to your Bad
Guys shoot better because of lack of training stats... not quite right is it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Was your HITS a case study in training? And how much training did he have? Who asked? Who knew? We still can't argue with his performance no matter how it got there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes, I fired 8 rounds for 2 hits, and he fired once for 1 hit... but then again, I walk on two legs and he hops on one. Who won?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
His "hit" rate is 100%. Yours is 25%. His was center mass. Yours was a leg? Your vest seems to be the deciding factor here, not shooting skills. Had we used shooting skills you would have lost big time. In fact your shooting skills had little to do with your survival in all honesty. It was a decision not related to shooting as such, but as to uniform apparel choices.
Bottom like it doesn't really matter what we do as long as we win. I had a cop here beat a guy half to death with a bat he fell against while in a violent fight with an offender. He couldn't get to his run and resort to a Louisville Slugger in the kids bedroom. A one shot stop we will note. Thug never saw it coming. A bunch of us had a black basketweave "bat holder" made for him and put the bat in it. He actually wore it out the door.You know, it didn't exactly look all that bad.
happened. He was 100% with that one shot - yes. But thats all he got.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Had you not been wearing a vest it would have been enough. His performance no matter how obtained was pretty good. It was MORE than enough. Your vest had no part on his perfomance. "Down before you knew what happened." Yup. that's how it works. No time for conflict management or verbal judo.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Considering he fired that round over his shoulder while running away from me - I think it was a fluke he hit me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Flukes are damned deadly. Can you recall mentions of "Murphys's law?" Well you got O'Toole's law that says, " Murphy was an optimist." That is how it works in the real world. I' working on an "Anti-O'Toole Law drill." The same flukes work for you. It doesn't matter how you win..just win. Leave the formal organized efforts for the target shooters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.
Most people think that too.
My stance when I returned fire? I was on my back, I braced my pistol along the side of my right leg. 30 meters, low light, just been centerpunched, scored two hits which put the BG down. I think it was not a bad performance on my part... but thats just me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Performance?" I think it was a FLUKE. How can we claim the bad guys have flukes and we don't? We seem to credit thier performance to luck and flukes and ours to some form of background training.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I hope you dont add that to your Bad
Guys shoot better because of lack of training stats... not quite right is it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Was your HITS a case study in training? And how much training did he have? Who asked? Who knew? We still can't argue with his performance no matter how it got there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes, I fired 8 rounds for 2 hits, and he fired once for 1 hit... but then again, I walk on two legs and he hops on one. Who won?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
His "hit" rate is 100%. Yours is 25%. His was center mass. Yours was a leg? Your vest seems to be the deciding factor here, not shooting skills. Had we used shooting skills you would have lost big time. In fact your shooting skills had little to do with your survival in all honesty. It was a decision not related to shooting as such, but as to uniform apparel choices.
Bottom like it doesn't really matter what we do as long as we win. I had a cop here beat a guy half to death with a bat he fell against while in a violent fight with an offender. He couldn't get to his run and resort to a Louisville Slugger in the kids bedroom. A one shot stop we will note. Thug never saw it coming. A bunch of us had a black basketweave "bat holder" made for him and put the bat in it. He actually wore it out the door.You know, it didn't exactly look all that bad.