MemphisJim
New member
For the sake of argument, I'll be the first to concede I may be more of a literalist than forums like these may care to endure. I was raised to believe that words are like bullets: they should be selected for the specific purpose for which they are intended, aimed directly at the subject and achieve the desired (or intended) result when loosed. In this forum (and others) I continually see the handgun universe broken into two categories: Pistols and Revolvers. What am I missing? As I see it, a pistol is a pistol...is a pistol...ad infinitum. The two primary sub-categories are: Semi and Revolver. Historically, revolvers, and antecedents, have the claim for naming the category. Semis at best have maybe about a 100 years of history. Certainly, within the last 30 years or so semis have become the dominant iteration of the category. Does that mean the word "pistol" should immediately conjure the image of a 1911 in my mind's eye rather than a Colt Navy? (For the record, all but two of my handguns are semis.) Maybe it's just a futile exercise in semantics, but it still bugs me. And I'll probably resist the impulse to go off on "magazines" vs "clips." Maybe.