WCWV said:I'm to a Mountaineer and I like the idea. The only concern I have is some folks need that training on the safe handling of a fire arm.
The big problem for me is reciprocity.
1) Where does the Second Amendment say anything about requiring training before one is allowed to exercise the right to keep and bear arms?
I'm to a Mountaineer and I like the idea. The only concern I have is some folks need that training on the safe handling of a fire arm.
The only concern I have is some folks need that training on the safe handling of a fire arm.
So, maybe the untrained folks in Washington State are simply worse shots than the trained owners in Oregon. The statistics really don't tell us anything.According to some random .org reprinting CDC stats, Washington State (no training requirement) had a total firearm death rate of 8.7 per 100K (homicide, suicide and accident) just less than 80% of Oregon (Training required for concealed carry) at 11.0
True -- the statistics presented don't tell us anything, because they include intentional shootings, they include shootings by police in the line of duty, and they don't differentiate between permit holders and non-permit holders.KyJim said:So, maybe the untrained folks in Washington State are simply worse shots than the trained owners in Oregon. The statistics really don't tell us anything.According to some random .org reprinting CDC stats, Washington State (no training requirement) had a total firearm death rate of 8.7 per 100K (homicide, suicide and accident) just less than 80% of Oregon (Training required for concealed carry) at 11.0
Maybe the WV sheriffs' association should have a chat with the CO sheriffs' association ...Taco-XL said:As i expected, the WV Sheriffs association came out of hiding and stated their disapproval.
As i expected, the WV Sheriffs association came out of hiding and stated their disapproval. Saying that they would now have to assume that everone is carrying.