Tennessee Gentleman
New member
Of course there is Chuck Norris
When we assume everyone else will see the link between firearms and the right to self-defense, we leave ourselves open to idiots and clever-antis.
People defended themselves for a LONG time before firearms became popular.
Sadly, that is misguided thinking. As in, how are you going to maintain any individual right, if you are dead? One simply cannot exercise any other right, if self preservation is not the dominant right.
By what grant of power or authority does Government or property owners divest any person of their preeminent right?
"I am a college professor in Florida where they lock you up for a long time for carrying a weapon on any campus. Even our recent bill allowing permit holders to keep their weapons in cars does not apply to campuses--carrying/storing there is verboten".
A lot of college students are horribly emotionally immature; not sure I'd feel comfortable with the partying with alcohol and firearms
but non-college students are OK? Or is this another case of "no one but me is professional enough..."
I think we are all guilty of this from time to time. We assume that anyone who isn't like us is responsible.
The government does by due process of law if I commit a crime. IMO the property owner has no such authority.
DIVEMEDIC: "but non-college students are OK? Or is this another case of "no one but me is professional enough..."
I think we are all guilty of this from time to time. We assume that anyone who isn't like us is (ir)responsible."
So, to get back on track: By what grant of power or authority does Government or property owners divest any person of their preeminent right?