pittspilot
New member
Okay this case is very simple.
1) Are they going the legal route or are they bringing a complaint before ICANN
2) Where are you guys based relative to HCI. The court that they are bringing the case under may not have personal jurisdiction to try the case. That would force HCI to come to where you are. Also there are a number of cases where location matters.
1) The Zippo Sliding scale test. This determines if you are in fact in violation of the FTDA or Lanham act. This standard will find that you are a non-commercial site, in fact you are a parody site, which receives high protection. If you are selling anything on your site, stop now.
2) The name HANDGUNCONTROL INC has probaly come into common usage, and as such cannot be protected as a trademark. The strength of their mark is now in the Generic catagory, and cannot be asserted as a strong trademark.
3)The one area you will find a problem is the likehood of consumer confusion. This could be mitigated by placing a ntice on the site that informs people that you are not HCI.
All in All this is very winnable, and if I was out of Law School, I would take this case Pro Bono.
Good Luck
Tim
Will Post this in an E-Mail to your site so that you have my address if I can help.
1) Are they going the legal route or are they bringing a complaint before ICANN
2) Where are you guys based relative to HCI. The court that they are bringing the case under may not have personal jurisdiction to try the case. That would force HCI to come to where you are. Also there are a number of cases where location matters.
1) The Zippo Sliding scale test. This determines if you are in fact in violation of the FTDA or Lanham act. This standard will find that you are a non-commercial site, in fact you are a parody site, which receives high protection. If you are selling anything on your site, stop now.
2) The name HANDGUNCONTROL INC has probaly come into common usage, and as such cannot be protected as a trademark. The strength of their mark is now in the Generic catagory, and cannot be asserted as a strong trademark.
3)The one area you will find a problem is the likehood of consumer confusion. This could be mitigated by placing a ntice on the site that informs people that you are not HCI.
All in All this is very winnable, and if I was out of Law School, I would take this case Pro Bono.
Good Luck
Tim
Will Post this in an E-Mail to your site so that you have my address if I can help.