Way to go New Jersey!

What I find extraordinary is that the school administrators thought it would be a good idea to prevent these students from sitting for their advanced placement tests. In my state, it is a requirement of an AP class that the student take the standardized AP test at the end; that's what makes it an AP class.

By preventing the students from taking a required test, have they screwed up their record irreparably?
It's also my understanding that AP tests are not free, and they're not cheap. Potentially, school administrators have injured these students and their parents: (1) financially; (2) in terms of their academic record; (3) in terms of college prospects. Heck, if I were a plaintiff's lawyer, I'd be arguing that their lifetime earning potential had been irreparably harmed.
 
this will go nowhere. the kid will go back to school, have a stain on his record through no fault of his own, and the school gets to say oops, sorry.
 
Given the change in the policy, I'd be willing to bet that any mark on the students' records will be wiped clean. If the school district wipes this from their records and makes arrangements for them to take those AP exams, then it at least has an argument that they haven't suffered any cognizable injury. No cognizable injury = no standing = lawsuit dies in its tracks.
 
Jerry said:
this will go nowhere. the kid will go back to school, have a stain on his record through no fault of his own, and the school gets to say oops, sorry.

I can't promise you that your prediction will be wrong, but the following militates against that result.

The school change in policy so quickly when challenged can indicate that they didn't engage in sufficient consultation before in forming the policy and implementing it, or they did consult sufficiently but proceeded irresponsibly anyway, and they knew they were wrong.

This could have been a mere fender bender, an overstep taken tentatively, announced and retracted before the harm was imposed. Instead, the school seems to have realised it was in a fender bender, then run to the car it hit to set it on fire. Some functionary thought it would be clever to use all of his very modest power to do irreparable harm.

Since there is money in that kind of malice, it may not just blow away.

Spats Mcgee said:
Given the change in the policy, I'd be willing to bet that any mark on the students' records will be wiped clean. If the school district wipes this from their records and makes arrangements for them to take those AP exams, then it at least has an argument that they haven't suffered any cognizable injury. No cognizable injury = no standing = lawsuit dies in its tracks.

Emphasis added. That would make the most sense if possible.

I don't know how this works now. My recollection is that I had to go to a local college to take this, as if AP testing wasn't run by the school in which the class is given, but by some other authority.
 
Even if they reschedule the test I can almost ascertain I could find an "expert witness" who will agree that the stress of the entire situation has negatively impacted my scores on those tests.
 
Thanks.

Lohman said:
Even if they reschedule the test I can almost ascertain I could find an "expert witness" who will agree that the stress of the entire situation has negatively impacted my scores on those tests.

If the lads are taught the missing week of material and given the test, the district would have more or less put humpty dumpty back together, even if imperfectly.

The best way to avoid being sued for injuring someone is to not really injure them.
 
I love the end result of no tolerance policies in a sue happy world. We literally have to put 'do not try this at home' on everything. Just having a picture of a gun at schools gets you suspended. I am not sure who to blame other than our judicial system for allowing us to sue for anything we want.
 
Page 57 Student Handbook

Aquila Blanca

Page 57 mentions no weapons or simulated weapons on school grounds. Plus a link to Lacey Township Board of Education further explains policy concerning weapons. There is no mention of the original zero tolerance policy that started the in school suspension fiasco resulting from student weapons handling on and off school grounds during academic sessions.
 
Back
Top