War with China Quite Possible , Soon!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have taken a lot of flak over this in the past but here goes. Normal logic does not work with the Chinese. There was a special called “Fire and Ice” on the History channel with this quote “They are chess players we are poker players” Translation , they don’t bluff and are willing to sacrifice pieces to get what they want. During the Korean war a Times correspondent said "they expend soldiers like we expend Ammunition". How many Chinese died in and around the frozen hell of Chosin, at least 4 army groups in an effort to wipe out the 1st Marine Division and the parts of the 7th infantry division at that location. They didn’t get it done and didn’t look back either. Look at the Boxer rebellion and the Japanese occupation, the simple fact is the Chinese Leadership cares not a wit about losses combat or otherwise.
The Chinese will start a war if they perceive an advantage for them in the end. If they loose 100 soldiers for each one we lose its probably a loss ratio they are willing to take and can take population wise. (After all aren’t they are trying to reduce their population anyway)

Now lets talk help, forget NATO, they cant take care of problems in their own yard, they wont want to travel half way around the world to play in a party on the pacific rim, against a foe that attacks in hordes and doesn’t care about losses. The Japanese might if they would loose their fear of international conflicts but down count on it(unless it affects their wallets). New Zealand or Australia maybe but their armed forces are so small and they have a limited ability to support them outside their borders.

I think the Chines are going to start a war or at least use the prospect to get their way, the facts have been indicating it for several years. They have spent an inordinate amount of time and money stealing technology from the west to improve their military. They have worked hard at getting US and NATO officers to show them how to improve their command and control systems as well as their logistics infrastructure, to support large bodies of men in the field for long periods. (a major Achilles heel in Korea) They have invested heavily in training, new infantry weapons and ballistic missiles. They are trying to build base in the Spratley islands, which would give them control over the straights of Malaka. They have gained control of the Panama canal by default, so they have control of 2 of the 5 choke points for shipping entering or leaving the Pacific ocean. The two major ones at that. They have built a listening station on Tarawa which sits astride the US Pacific Missile test range and along the lines of communication and supply from the US to Australia and New Zealand.

There has been a lot more in the news over the past few years if you want to do some digging.

The simple fact is they have spent too much time and money on their modernization of the military in the last 10 years to be doing much else.

Ok now come back and tell me I am some kind of conspiracy theorist nut and that the Chinese just want to be out friends.

I don’t pretend to know what they are up to but when I see a film clip of a Chinese regiment practicing a amphibious assault with a knock off of a M-14 rifle I get concerned on two levels. One, what are they training for and two, I would not want to face an M-14 if all I had was an M-16 they have got me by both weight of shot and range.


[This message has been edited by Alan B (edited March 10, 2000).]
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Alan B:
Ok now come back and tell me I am some kind of conspiracy theorist nut and that the Chinese just want to be out friends.[/quote]

I don't dispute the facts you present, but I maintain that their interests are regional -- not global. No, they don't want to be our friend, but they don't want to be our enemy, either. It's not that simple. It seems to me that they want to establish their place in Asia, much of which would be at our expense. But, as Gary said, they can't wage an overseas conventional war. So, they have to rely on threats instead.

Sure, they own some real estate in Panama, but they could never hope to hold it -- much less use it in any way to their advantage -- in a war against the US. Panama is clearly in our sphere of influence, and we would go to great lengths to protect the canal.

And I don't think the US is stupid enough to invade China, although it might intervene in the event of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan.
 
When my father was in the Navy in the early '60s, the official line was the next major war would be Russia and the US against China.

China has been declaring openly in its media that the US was the enemy and that there WOULD be a war between the two in the future.

As to China's interests being regional, do the words "Japan", "Singapore", "South Korea," "Cambodia," "Thailand," "Vietnam" ring a bell? These are all areas within that "region" you were talking about and which China has lusted after. If the US backs down over Taiwan (which we probably will with the current Traitor in Chief), China gets to pressure those other areas wiht impunity. And before you say it, yes, the US would back down if Japan or South Korea were threatened. The thinking would go along the lines that "in the long run, what would we lose?" Outside of a massive trade deficit that would almost immediately be eliminated. We import from those countries but don't get to sell anything to them (due to trade barriers). And the commodities they produce are produced by American corps. or other foreign nations.
 
Panama oh yes, they can't hope to hold it.. true. But they can stop it up long enough to finish what they are doing in the pacific, while we try to get control of it back. Or they can stop passage of ships and men through the canal long enough to take Taiwan. Before someone says it, the only US Navy ships that can't use the Canal are the Carriers. All the destroyers, frigates, cruisers, Gator boats and support ships can.

The other interesting thing about the canal is, if you blow the lake at the top, it will take years to open the canal again. However long it lakes to fix the damn and fill the lake. It took three years to fill it the first time, and the water to operate the canal comes from the lake.

Factoid: With out the Panama canal at, 30kts it takes at least 10 extra days steaming time to transit a ship from the east coast to the west coast of the US or vise versa.

I have always wondered what keeps the Chinese from propositioning supplies in those shipping containers. They can move it and store it for years and as long as they don't leave a free trade area no one looks inside. Heck they have even smuggled people in those containers. Think they might try smuggling an entire army into Panama in air-conditioned containers, after they have propositioned the containers with the arms and supplies? Remember the Chines won’t care if these troops ever make it home.

Did you catch the news story about a month ago that COSCO the Chinese shipping company was going to arm is merchant ships??

True the Chinese can only throw missiles at us, but we do have a few allies that are within walking distance.

Is the plot getting any thicker?


[This message has been edited by Alan B (edited March 10, 2000).]
 
Why would the Chinese invade any other country in Asia other than Taiwan? If they invaded a country, it would ruin that country's economy. If, say, South Korea's economy was destroyed, this would certainly hurt the Chinese more than any possible gain they could hope to get out of it. It would not be in their economic interests to invade. The difference with Taiwan is that they see Taiwan as their own already. But the Taiwanese certainly don't invest in or trade with China, so a war with Taiwan would not hurt the Chinese economy in any way.

Okay, you say the Chinese don't consider their economic interests, that they are blindly expansive and militaristic. But there is no recent historical evidence of that, other than their attitude towards Taiwan. Just because they want to upgrade their defense industry, doesn't mean they're planning to attack the rest of Asia.

By the way, alot has changed since the sixties, buzz_knox! Ever heard of the Sino-Soviet Split? Detente? Massive border skirmishes between China and the USSR? Nixon's visit to China to use China against the USSR? The fall of the Berlin Wall? Geopolitics is a bit different now than it was in the sixties.

I don't think the Chinese would EVER invade South Korea or Japan. But, if they did, I really think the US would intervene in some way.
 
Bezdelnik
Where have you been? The Chinese and Russians just signed a new strategic agreement in the last few months. The Russians are supplying new plans, ships, tanks, submarines and advisers. For what?

To use your logic they should not have intervened in North Korea in 1950 after North Korea had already lost they war?

You are applying the logic of a capitalist government, not a communist government that only wants one thing, to Stay in power, and what better way than by starting a little war. Most importantly of all is to not loose, face they will fight over that above all else.

Look at how they have been systematically taking the capitalist system apart in Hong Kong, that proves they don’t care about money except to finance their machine.

Remember what I said in my first post?
Let me state it this way.
"They don't think the way we think they should”
Remember what the fight over Pork Chop hill was about just before the cease fire was signed? It was about saving face and to see if they could bully us. It didn’t concern them that they took tons more casualties than we did over what was about nothing but symbolism.

Let me ask you this Why have they tried to beat up on Vietnam twice since 1972? It wouldn’t gain them anything economically.
Unfortunate for them but the Vietnamese had a field trained army at that time as they had just spent 10 years training against us, and the Chinese got whipped good.
 
Were I in a leadership position, they might call me a butcher. I only see the problem getting worse, and if I thought the environment could withstand it (or, if we'd kept developing our ERW's like we should've), I would nuke China at the first provocation...but then, I'm a little guy, and don't like playing around with bullies. Hit 'em fast, hard, and continuously. Don't let up 'till they don't get up...
 
Call me cynical, but I would be really impressed if China had its act together enough to even get Taiwan back, much less invade the US. I lived in Beijing in the late 80s and went back there to work in 1998. Nothing EVER worked -- the phones, computers, automobiles, plumbing, appliances -- and this was in the capital, in major commerce areas. I guess they are just pouring all available resources into building a superior military? I don't know, but if what I've seen is any indication, the big bosses would have a pretty tough time relaying any kind of orders to the front, because they wouldn't be able to get in touch with them!

Anyone TFLers who have lived/been stationed in the PRC can probably relate. It's infuriating!


------------------
*quack*
 
Wow,a lot of good posts on this string I started.

Well, incase the plot was not thick enough already I have a list of facts that
I would like to throw on the fire and see
what happens.

1. In 1990, George Bush Sr.shot up a large portion of our smart bombs,tonahawk missles and cruise missles in our first war with
Iraq.
Munitions were expended and none were replaced. The US Arsonel was left, let us say
for sake of argument, 40% down from max.
I dont know the actual %.

The point is , no weapons were replaced.

Along comes Our Boy- Bill, who shuts down
many of the US Military Bases and discharges
most of our armed services. After Bill is finished decimating the US Military, lets say
that we are 80% drawn down in trained manpower and closed training bases.

What Slick Bill has left us with is best described as a skeliton crew.

Now, let me jump back to the US Arsonel of
Weapons that was 40% DRAWN DOWN by the first Iraq war.

Christmas 1998 and Bill decides to use up another 25% of our US Arsonel on Bagdad.

Again ,no expended weapons are replaced .
The US Arsonel is 65% empty.

I remember in both Bagdad and Kosovo, US pilots complaining of having to pull 16
hour shifts because we only has 50 % of the required number of trained pilots.

The US Military has not been expanded and is still staffed at skeliton crew levels.

Now Klinton shoots off the last 30% of our
US Arsonel and again , no replacement of expended weapons.

The US arsonel is 95% empty....only 5% or
no more that 15% left.
I am guessing at these percentages and I hope that I am very ,very wrong while I am scared that I am not very far off.

I claim,contend,allege that Bill has left us with a skeliton crew with no wheres near enough weapons to do much for more than a week or two, in a conventional war.

Now , to rub salt in the wound, Bill allegedly sells and/or allows to be stolen,
our latest missle guidance systems, and military technoligy to/by the Red Chinese.

A leader who was broke from lawyers bills incured in an impeachment trial for pergury
suddenly buys a 1.8 Million dollar Mansion
in New York.

Did funds arrive from China?

This same leader allows the US Strigic Oil Reserves to be drawn down by 40% so that now
in Mar2000 the oil reserves are only 60% full.

Our Buddy Bill,knew about OPEC's 12% decrease
of oil production as early as June of 1999
and Definately by Sept 1999 and yet did nothing to deminish our 55% dependency on
imported oil; in fact , because of Klinton's
domestic energy policies, tax burdens and environmental regulations on domestic producers, the closing of public lands
especially the Plains oil field in Alaska,
which alone if developed could supply 25% of our current domestic demands, we are seeing Gasoline at$1.60/gal in most of the Northeast
and a gallon of gas in Manhatten is current $2.oo/gal for cheapest regular.

The other point I wanted to make in the proceeding sentence was that of 10,000
domestic oil well producers in America, 4000 have closed their doors and the other 6,000 are having tough times.

These are not gasoline retailer like Exxon,Mobile ,Arco -- these are the guys that drill the wells and bring up the crude and sometimes get dry holes.

Desiel fuel went from 79 cents a gallon to 2.25 a gallon, and many indipendent truck drivers are surrendering their trucks to the repo companies. Other independent truck drivers cant afford to start their engines and are parking their trucks until the price of desiel is again cost effective.They only
opperate on a 3% to 4% profit margin and a
190% increase in fuel cost makes them opperate at a 20 % loss.

70 % of American communities are supplied solely by tractor-trailer trucks. If you bought it in a store, it got there on a truck.

The trucking industry currently is opperating
with a 50 % shortage of trained & qualified drivers and has been getting by via giving drivers overtime and using independent truckers to fill the vacantcies.

Now ,the independent truckers are surrendering their trucks and finding work in other occupations.
THANK YOU ,KOMRADE KLINTONOV

If you think this does not affect you, think
again. You will notice a 10% to 20% increase in the price of everything that you buy as the current trucking contracts run out and are renogotiated at the higher price reflecting the almost tripple price of desiel fuel.

The US Armed Services run on gasoline,jet fuel and deseal fuel. Their fuel appropiations for 2000 are only enough for
50 % of the fuel they require at peace time levels with the new prices.

Look for gasoline prices of $2.oo/gal by
the end of May 2000 and $2.50 by july 2000

I hope you have a 4 cylinder or are rich.

By The way, did I mention That Komrade Klintonov gave the panama Canal over to Red Chinese Control. The Red Chinese have our old
Panama military base now and have it full of CONTAINER TRAILERS , like a 18 wheeler would haul.Each one can hold 100 troups and their
weapons & munitions.

Thanks to Klinton, if the Chinese can not hold the canal for thier own use, they can easily blow it up and add 10 days steaming time to US shipping.

The Chinese also have a similar "international area" ,where we are not allowed to inspect, in California because
Komrade Klintonov leased it to them.

It too,is full of container cars full of
alleged troups ,weapons and explosives,
maybe.

Now , let us remember the 95% empty Us Arsonels. They are empty because no new govt orders went out to the manufacturers
in the last 8 years since Komrade Klintonov
became Traitor In Chief.
Now, lets make believe that we suddenly get funding to re-arm the military and go back to the companies that made the tomahawk & cruise missles that Klinton expended and did
not replace.

we go to where the cruise missle factory
was 10 years ago,the last time the govt did business with them,with money in hand and there is a MacDonald's drive in restrant and a Taco Bell there instead.

The cruise and tomahawk missle factories have gone out of business, the machiney sold and the workers fired and reemployed in fast food
services industry.

We find that we have lost the means of production to rearm ourselves and new machinery must be designed and then built and then shipped to the new factory which must be built from the ground up.

And there is a shortage of truck drivers and trucks and deseal fuel and gasoline and jet fuel.

Maybe we might get a factory up and running in two or three years and by the fourth year start getting some replacement cruise & tomahawk missles.

And how long does it take to train more infantry men and green berrets,delta force commandos.
How long does it take to train a green jet fighter pilot to the point where he can engage seasoned enemy fighter pilots without getting shot down on his first engagement?

So you see, thanks to Komrade Klintonov and his policies, the USA finds itself in much the same position that the USA was in at the begining of World War 2 in 1938 , with no soldiers and no planes and no equipment and no means of production to make armaments.

Back then,it took us from 1938 to 1942,
4 years ,to make the tools to make the machines so that we could start to make the weapons and them delever them to our troups.

Why is it that I have a nasty feeling that some one set the USA up to take a big fall to China by decimating and allegedly sabataging our military trained manpower, our weapons
stockpile, our fuel stockpile, our means of
production for both weapons and domestic crude oil, wherefrom we derive the fuel to run the military??

Am I just being parinoid or were we set up.

Will there be an election in Nov. 2000
or will Bill Klinton envoke the Emergency War Powers Act and ursurp a third term.

I sincerely hope that I am very ,very wrong about all this because it scares me to death to think that I am correct.

Those who, asleep on watch, fail to consider
the lessons of history, are doomed to repeat
the same mistakes.
 
I watched a documentary on China a number of years ago. The documentary has to be atleast 20+ years old by now. Anyway, one of the points covered was the Chinese military. At that time they could field a 200 million man army. That included active duty, reservists and all able bodied men that could be put into uniform. If I remember correctly, the population of the US was not 200 million at the time. With their current population a 300 million man army is probably no problem for them to raise. Granted they may not be able to arm all of them now but let their industrial base get a little bigger. Sobering thought.
 
Nothing personal, but I think you guys are a little bit too paranoid about China. Weren't you the same guys who went around during the Cold War saying the Russians are getting ready to invade?

I'm not defending China. I would feel more comfortable, too, if they didn't have such a large army. But I'm just trying to be realistic.

I think the Chinese government would be extremely flattered that you guys have such a high opinion of them -- that they are so technologically advanced and capable of the greatest global conspiracy of all time!

:rolleyes:
 
Bezdelnik...

Read: "The Creature from Jekyll Island", by G. Edward Griffin [American Media]. Until you know the facts behind the objectives of the establishment elite, it's best to just keep learning before commenting. Otherwise, you end up being just another fooled member of the ignorant populace.

In any war, it is best to identify and understand your enemy, thereby preventing the destruction of your own friends because of poor intelligence.
 
Bezdelnik, I tend to side with you estimate...though China has the capability to fight a major war, it would seem illogical for them to try. Then again, who would have thought that about the little harmless Japan...

[This message has been edited by Oleg Volk (edited March 13, 2000).]
 
All:

You might find this week's STRATFOR Global Intelligence Update of interest - GIU

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Summary

In recent weeks, the world has focused attention on Beijing’s threats against Taiwan and deteriorating relations with the United States. But both are merely symptomatic of a larger shift within China itself: traditional leaders of the Communist Party are dramatically gaining the upper hand against pro-Western economic reformers. The government has executed the highest-ranking official in decades, a top official in an economically significant province. And an old face – Li Peng – has returned to power. If these victories hold, there will be a sharp reversal of China’s economic and foreign policies.[/quote]




------------------
Slowpoke Rodrigo...he pack a gon...

Vote for the Neal Knox 13
 
Oleg...

Wasn't trying to be impolite, or anything but civil. Just trying to point out that without good "intelligence" (secret information; especially, such information about an enemy...as defined in the dictionary), we are left with nothing but our ignorance. You'll even note that I provided a source of this intelligence for your readers to study for themselves.

Maybe concluding that a "master plan" lies behind world events is taking too big of a bite out of a very complex subject, which requires such intensive research to comprehend.

It is easy to be insulted when we are faced with the truth, after becoming so comfortable with lies.
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Paul Revere:
In any war, it is best to identify and understand your enemy, thereby preventing the destruction of your own friends because of poor intelligence. [/quote]

Oh, there's a war going on with China? I guess I haven't read the newspapers today! Well, I guess it just goes to show I'm a full-fledged member of the "ignorant populace." :rolleyes:

I could just as easily say you've been duped by the author of the book to which you are refering, but I'll refrain. I'm not looking for a fight, here -- are you? What does a conspiracy-theory book about the fed have to do with China's intent to invade Asia, anyway?

Actually, I agree with you on the point about understanding your enemy. But there is no war, unless you personally have declared war on China. Even so, I'm quite certain that our military and civilian intelligence agencies are much more informed about this than either you or me.
 
What the heck is my computer thinking?!?!? Sorry, didn't mean to post three times!

Moderator/Administrator: Please feel free to delete some of my repeated posts. Again, sorry to all!
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Paul Revere:
Oleg...
Wasn't trying to be impolite, or anything but civil.
[/quote]

Actually, I re-read your post and mine and realized that I over-reacted. I apologize for that.

Oleg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top