Wanting to be left alone, and overkill.

Wildcard

Moderator
Date posted online: Saturday, March 25, 2006
Subject of 22-hour 'standoff' says police handled it wrong
By Michele Linck Journal staff reporter



Walter "Mike" Thurber, the man whose home Sioux City police surrounded during a 22-hour standoff on Feb. 21-22, says the whole incident was "overkill" and much more expensive than it needed to be.

Thurber, who admitted to being "awfully depressed" at the time, said he was just exercising his right to privacy and his right not to answer his door.

He spoke to the Journal Friday at the Mental Health Institute in Cherokee, Iowa, where he is receiving therapy after being sent there by the court following the incident. Dressed in a plaid shirt and bluejeans, the articulate 39-year-old declined to be photographed.
He craves anonymity, but said he wants the public to know his side of the "standoff" story. He said he was rankled by Police Chief Joe Frisbie's "giving everybody attaboys" for the way the standoff was handled.

"I prefer to call it a siege rather than a standoff," he said. "I was in my home minding my business. How is that a standoff?

"They destroyed my house. I don't know a window in the house that they didn't shoot out with (tear gas) grenades, even little tiny decorative windows." He said a police negotiator told him they would take care of the damage, but he doesn't know if the house, at 3806 W. Fourth St., has been boarded up yet.

He said that after awhile during the "siege," he was so overstimulated by everything that he's not sure if he was asleep when a loud flash-bang device designed to wake him up was detonated. He said he put a wet towel over his head to cope with the tear gas, which left a powdery coating throughout the house; even the water tasted of it.

Knowing that Thurber owned firearms, the police department, its Strategic Emergency Response Team, hostage negotiations team, and a mobile command center -- and later a replacement team from the Woodbury County Sheriff's Office and a tactical robot from Des Moines -- turned out to persuade Thurber to come out of his house and talk to them, hoping to keep him from harming himself, or them.

Thurber said they also made all outgoing calls from his cell phone to ring to their negotiators. He said he might have felt better if he could have called his girlfriend, Teri, or his father in Washington. They offered to get them on the line, but he said he felt that violated his privacy.

"I'm a single person in the house," Thurber said Friday. "No hostages, no threats against anybody and they bring out everything short of the National Guard. They know me. There have been welfare checks at the home before. It's never taken a SWAT team, tactical robot and two command centers to get me out of the house.

"It's almost like a war game," he said. "These guys have full (tactical) uniforms, Kevlar helmets and machine guns. What kind of firepower is that for a guy who says, no, I'm scared. I'm not coming out of my house?

"It was just unbelievable to me," he said. "At no point did they just offer to have a guy not in full battle dress to come to the door and just talk to me." He said he would have understood the "siege" if he had a hostage or was being aggressive. "But I was just sitting in my room dodging grenades.

"If I was truly going to commit suicide, wouldn't that aggravate the situation to the point I'd be more likely to do something like that?"

As for the concern over his gun cache, which turned out to be "at least two rifles" according to police, Thurber said, "This is the Midwest. Everybody has guns." He said he likes to work on guns and target shoot. He said the only things he's ever shot are a squirrel and a pheasant. He said a gun that authorities removed from his house after a welfare check a year earlier was not a true AK-47, but a .22-caliber rifle made to look like an assault rifle.

"I wouldn't have done anything violent. I have never done anything violent," Thurber said.

"They could have handled it a lot less expensive," Thurber said, noting Frisbie was quoted saying the standoff cost the city up to $700 an hour. "If they needed to wait it out," he said, "a couple of patrol cars could've done that."

Thurber said the whole thing started when he called his younger sister, who lives near Los Angeles. "I had run out of money, unemployed. I was just to a bad point," he said. "I was feeling awfully depressed. I probably did upset my sister. She didn't even call me back to say, hey, Mike, calm down. It's not that bad."

Instead, concerned about his well-being, she called the Sioux City police.

Police said after the standoff that no crime occurred. However, he was committed for mental health care. He is allowed visits from his Sioux City girlfriend, Teri, whom he says he loves dearly, and is not restricted in his movements about the institute. He is hoping to be sent to a small residential facility soon where he can work on putting his life together rather than on his mental health issues.

http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/arti...3c000a4311.txt

ID: NewsLinks
Login: NewsLinks
ebd10 is offline
 
Good guys gone bad.

I remember a similar one years ago.
(Must have been the movie that Clint Eastwood made that prompted all those house destroying, shoot the cannister into and on the wooden floor and it goes up like a camp fire).

Only difference with this one, is it was the SLA and it ruined their day.
Patty Hearst and she is still in the newspaper business.
Go figure.

I know off topic and not exactly what others want to hear while bashing the police on a daily basis and most here love it.

HQ
 
Last edited:
Instead, concerned about his well-being, she called the Sioux City police.
I think it's important to know the contents of that conversation before passing judgement.
hoping to keep him from harming himself, or them.
If they do nothing, and he does harm himself, we still have this thread, but from another angle.

It's easy to Monday morning quarterback when you have the aid of hind-sight to base your position on. It's easy to have a prejudice or position, then seek out stories that support same. It's easy to watch what LE do from the comfort of your computer chair, then no matter what they do, adopt a contrary position and criticize. I, for one, do not envy the position they are in.

Overkill? Quite likely, but I think they need to be judged in the same manner we would all like to be judged if the use of deadly force was needed by ourselves. What would a reasonable and prudent person have done in that situation, at that time, with the same information?
 
jcoiii

Maybe you'll like this one better.

Frisbee should be fired, lose his pension, have all the windows shot out in his house and come up on criminal charges. Why the hell should Sioux City waste taxpayer money on a welfare case? If the nut job had killed himself, that would be one less on the welfare rolls. These cops overstepped their boundaries, and we're sick and tired of it and not going to take it anymore. Anyone involved in this should be immediately fired. Anybody guilty by association, but not directly involved, should be at least kicked in the nuts.

More to your liking???:D :D :D
 
Kicked in the nuts, and kicked again while down

Take him and string him up, no trial, and then will you be happy.:D

The boys is sioux city are not going to sleep easy for a long time.
Next time you want to advise a welfare check on your granny think again.

Maybe some of them were women and have no -----, what then?:D

HQ
 
That started out good but should read:

Frisbee should be fired, lose his pension, have all the windows shot out in his house and come up on criminal charges. Why the hell should Sioux City waste taxpayer money on idiots who think riot gear and tear gas makes them look sexy? I think that anyone making administrative decisions on this should be sacked immediately! Anybody who didn't have any rank but still took these orders should be kicked in the nuts. These cops overstepped their boundaries, and we're sick and tired of it and not going to take it anymore
 
Both the sister and the cops need serious psychiatric care .The police certainly need to have their guns taken away for the way they acted !!!
 
Everyone involved here I think over reacted to something that could have been resolved with a visit from a local psychologist or healthcare counselor.

Personally I think if someone feels that suicide is the answer, well it's their life and they have the right to end it if they want. I myself have contemplated it in my life but I also believe it is a mortal sin and wouldn't feel right taking the easy way out.

I find it hard to believe though, that all this was in response to someone who just said they were depressed. I agree we should hear the contents of the conversation between the guy and his sister before rendering any final opinions on responsibility. If the guy said, "I can't take it anymore, i'm gonna do it this time." then yes the response may have been warranted. But if it was just something along the lines of, "Life sucks!" well then no.:cool:
 
I have a very deep seated respect, . . . even admiration for the vast majority of LEO's, . . . there was even a time when I aspired to be one of them.

If I had put on the blue uniform, though, . . . I would probably have quit over some of the bs they are doing these days, . . . and the above scenario is just one example.

It's just too bad we can't put this modern crop of jack booted thugs out to pasture someplace.

May God bless,
Dwight
 
I believe that Glock 31 has a very good thought.

The big deal here is not the fact that they shot guns.

They shot teargas cannisters to be able, to make entry based on some pretty scary information from his sister (my thought).

So all the bs from the peanut gallery is just that. I actually have more of a problem with the ones running off at the keyboard then I do with the actual incident.

So he makes a big deal in court and all. How do you know he is telling the truth or his sister?

I am sure with a little bit of investigation, and it will happen, the truth is the guy is nutso, and they might have overreacted, or not.

To repair a kicked door was normal even if the guy was guilty in the city I worked. So because they are repairing the damage does not make them guilty.
Not yet anyway.

What is good for the citizen has to be good for the LEO also. But not on this board.

HQ
 
It's amazing how many people are capable of making a decision about an incident with only one side of the story. I guess it's easy when your mind is already made up. Thank god you're not cops.
 
mind made up

"It's amazing how many people are capable of making a decision about an incident with only one side of the story. I guess it's easy when your mind is already made up. Thank god you're not cops."

The side of the story that was presented showed that the cops already had their mind made up. My mind is not made up (yet), just want to point out that it APPEARS that the cops reacted excessively. This might just be what the poster had in mind.:confused:

That said, there has been a distressing tendancy in recent years to call out all the dogs, and trot out all the toys whenever the situation can be even remotely hazardous. Sadly it appears (in some jurisdictions) that gone are the days when the police investigated and determined the actual extent of a situation before calling out the (para)military troops.
 
I think everyone from the sister on forward to us is overreacting. The dude wanted to be left alone, sure. But it is the job of the police to protect lives. A better tact might have been to let him know his sister just wanted to be sure he is all right. Determine if he is a threat to himself and others. If he is a threat to only himself, send in a psychologist to determine if hospitalization is neccesary. If he is not a danger to himself or others, let him be; isn't that the whole point of a welfare-check?
 
Always someone around to defend the Keystone Cops...

No hostage.

No violence.

No threats.

The cops admit there was no crime.

Yet...

On a phone call(the caller and motivations of the caller being difficult to verify under any circumstances) we have...

A destroyed house.

An incarcerated Citizen.

Large sums of money wasted.

A neighborhood placed in danger.

There is no defense for this. No investigation, nor slander regarding the mental state of the victim, will change the very visible events and results. Unfortunately, nothing is going to change the ever increasing militaristic bent of cops across this nation, either.

But I'm sure the peanut gallery will always produce those who will try and whitewash anything... :barf:
 
Back
Top