Another +1 for Rossi 92. The recent years' (decades now) models have a dumb and IMO not needed safety switch atop the receiver some have successfully eliminated. Others have lived with without issue. Ideally - best ones are pre '06 EMF "Hartfords" (not that commonplace on used market) and Interarms models--all w/o the safety, ie like John Browning originally designed them--just with the half cock hammer "safety." All LSI (Legacy) "Pumas"--which were ca mid 1990s-2008 or so--have the fukakata safety,as do the current "Rossi" labeled ones via Taurus/Braztech. In my view, if you've never had one of the "safety-less" models, the little switch won't be a deal breaker. For some of us shooting these from the "unembellished" early 80s, it's kind of an irritant it's there, even if removeable..
Re the CAS shoots, most of the 73s and 66s have been worked-to-heck over and shoot (in those matches) very light loads. As stated, they're also very pricey. I'm not entirely convinced about these in the .357 chambering as an "all-around" rifle. I would love a Uberti (Cimarron/Taylors) carbine in .44-40 or non original (Win 73) .44 Sp, just because--the design reeks of history, etc. Otherwise, the '92--so ubiquitous with TV and movie westerns--however inaccurately portrayed vs the "more legitimate" 73/66 as the "Gun that Won The West"--is a much stronger action, especially in recent decades' produuced models and modern chamberings, and especially for "normally" or hotly loaded magnums,...and is a lighter gun. It is true that--almost from one gun to another, like personalities, are different in that some shoot the shorter "specials" (.38/.44) better than others out-of-the-box, ie are more or less OAL sensitive. Speaking of weight, the Henry is way unnecessarily heavy for what it is. A real chunk. My .02