Your original thread, and reasoning, was a nightmare of imprecise logic, poorly defined terms, and incredible generalizations, and an impenetrable fixation for equating "cheap" with lacking in quality, and "expensive" as being higher quality.
By that logic, cars made in Detroit in the 1970s should have been the world's greatest cars, especially when compared to those cheap Japanese imports.
Funny thing was, however, that American expense bought you lousy fit, lousy finish, lousy mechanical reliability, lousy styling, lousy ergonomics, lousy gas mileage, lousy long-term durability, ad infinitum.
Those cheap (lacking in quality?) Japanese imports, on the other hand? Evaluated on price alone, they must have been horrible... Funny thing was, though, they were head and shoulders above American cars in so many categories it wasn't even funny.
That was my problem with it.
And, as Frenchy notes, you now throw yet ANOTHER new term into the mix, which further clouds the water.
Is the satin finish a delux finish? No. It's not.
But a satin finish isn't lead, either. Nor is a "delux" finish gold.