Vintage Redfield scopes opposite adjustments

I have a couple of the new redfield revenges including one mounted on a heavy-recoiling 444 marlin, I got them cheap on sale and they so far have performed excellently, tracking is accurate and glass is good enough for very good consistency at reasonable hunting ranges, I'd rate them a step above the Nikon prostaff that used to dominate the budget 3 x 9 hunting scope market (almost all of my cheaper Nikons started falling apart right after Nikon went out of the scope business, I wonder if they knew something?).
 
The Redfield Revolutions, I like.
The Revenge, not so much. I bought one, with plans to buy a few more, and was very glad that I waited on the rest.

The glass is just too cheap. Color, clarity, distortion are all disappointing.
Twice the price of a Revolution, for half the quality.


---

Keep in mind that, for now, Leupold is only making matte black scopes, and only the "core" products.
No silver, no high gloss, no models that sell in low numbers, no custom shop, no Redfields.
So if you want a scope that looks "period correct" on the rifle, you'll have to:
A) Turn to the used market.
B) Wait. For an undetermined amount of time.
 
I just put a Burris Fullfield 4 on my 30/06 I went with 3-12 X 42. So far so good, I bore sited it last night. I went with Millett twist on style mounts, the height is perfect. I need to get out today and burn some powder. Not a fan of the Weaver mounts it had before.
 
Modern scopes are over rated. Why everyone wants to be a "weekend sniper" wanna-be is beyond me!

Hunting scopes are basic, and were manufactured that way. The 3x-9x hunting scopes really can not be improved...just added bells and whistles as a selling point. Target Shooting and Long distance hunting is another subject!

In the mid-60's a Remington bolt action rifle was about $170 while a Redfield 3x-9x scope was about $95. Can you imagine paying $800 for a bolt action rifle and $600 for a scope now days? How about a $350 bolt action from walmart and a $200 scope from Leupold?

Things that make ya go hmmmmmm!

Redfield made some really nice scopes back in the 60's and 70's...maybe even the 80's. Eventually purchased and made in the Philippians by Leupold, the Redfield scope were eventually bought out by Academy Sports and now made in China like most everything else in America.

Leupold even made a limited 6x fixed scope I would love to have had. Dump the bells and whistles and go hunt!
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    462.3 KB · Views: 15
Last edited:
Modern scopes are over rated. Why everyone wants to be a "weekend sniper" wanna-be is beyond me!

Hunting scopes are basic, and were manufactured that way. The 3x-9x hunting scopes really can not be improved...just added bells and whistles as a selling point. Target Shooting and Long distance hunting is another subject!

In the mid-60's a Remington bolt action rifle was about $170 while a Redfield 3x-9x scope was about $95. Can you imagine paying $800 for a bolt action rifle and $600 for a scope now days? How about a $350 bolt action from walmart and a $200 scope from Leupold?

Things that make ya go hmmmmmm!

Redfield made some really nice scope back in the 60's and 70's...maybe even the 80's. Eventually purchased and made in the Philippians by Leupold, the Redfield scope were eventually bought out by Academy Sports and now made in Chins like most everything else in America.

Leupol even made a limited 6x fixed scope I would love to have had. Dump the bells and whistles and go hunt!
Well said !
I can still do some passable shooting with my old Weaver blue steel tubed fixed K4-X on my 30-06 ... no bells ... no whistles !
Gary
 
On a side note, reference Bear Cub...

I am not too awfully familiar with the original Bear Cub scope line...but they were originally manufactured by the Kollmorgen Optical Corp for M.L. Stith between 1950 and 1956. Kollmorgen manufactured scope optics for submarines during WWII. Redfield purchased the rifle scope line rights from Kollmorgen in 1958 or 1959.

I purchased a Redfield Accu-Range 3x-9x (M40) 1964 replica scope from Hi-Lux and thoroughly enjoy it. It has a few extra bells and whistles, called the Tactical Hunter, with BDC holdover marks for the .308 cartridge. Works fine for the 30-06 for my needs.

Ranges out past 250 yards can be estimated by using the built in range finder. Anything inside of 250 yards needs no special attention.
 

Attachments

  • 429625963_1510971099764378_5603461887062699571_n.jpg
    429625963_1510971099764378_5603461887062699571_n.jpg
    309.1 KB · Views: 10
  • 429141743_418895020605324_4149450354849655073_n.jpg
    429141743_418895020605324_4149450354849655073_n.jpg
    193 KB · Views: 13
  • 429830452_390420570365201_6538893444026920437_n.jpg
    429830452_390420570365201_6538893444026920437_n.jpg
    164.7 KB · Views: 9
Last edited:
I'll throw in that forth and fifth photo here
 

Attachments

  • 429945753_962521755449320_2818961915878020300_n.jpg
    429945753_962521755449320_2818961915878020300_n.jpg
    335.7 KB · Views: 15
  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    533.8 KB · Views: 12
Last edited:
A lot of bells and whistles. A busy and confused sniper one would become. Reticle for hunting should be no more than duplex. :)

Money has inflated 6x since the 60s. $95 scope back then is equivalent to $570 today. Sounds like a high-end one. I bet a $200 scope today will do the same job, if not better.

-TL

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 
I have a Redfield widefield 3x9 that came on a 308 I bought, it currently sits on a ruger#3 223 Rem I have and once I got the thing sighted in it's been great.
Sure it has some some idiosyncrasies but what piece of equipment doesn't. For a 30 - 40 year old scope that's never been serviced it done good.
 
Not much change

Technology has not done much with regard to our guns. It's not necessary, the grand old 30-06 round will do the same job today as it did 100 years ago. Unlike many things that round might be fired from a gun of the same vintage.
Optics have changed very significantly over the years. Better glass, check. Better lens grinding? Double check. Superior optical designs thanks to cheap supercomputer time? Certainly.
In addition are the lens coatings present on all but the lowest end scopes today.
Modern technology has greatly benefitted optics, far more than the guns the optics are attached to. Most all my hunting guns are senior citizens, the glass they wear is not.
 
old scopes

If the OP is satisfied with his old Redfield and all he intends for it is to "target shoot" I see no reason to suggest him to change. If it works, why fix it? As to how the old scope will do with 7mm mag recoil can only reman to be seen. Again, if all I was doing was punching paper, I'd shoot it 'till it breaks.

I have some older Redfields, though not as vintage as the one described. I sent two back to the Ironsight OK outfit to be rebuilt, a fixed 4x and a Widefield 2.75x(?), back when it was $50 and the turnaround was a month or so. Neither is mounted on a rifle anymore. Why? A semi-modern Leupold VariX-II from the '90's, a Burris Fullfield from the same era, either USA or import, or recently a Leupold Freedom or a Vortex Crossfire II, all $200 dollar or less scopes when I bought them, offer greater clarity and are distinctly brighter in low or flat light. If one intends to hunt their rifles in all conditions, a more recent halfway decent scope is way ahead of a vintage number. I'll add that if not rebuilt, one is taking a gamble on the old seals. The animal of a lifetime may appear and your scope has gone wonky.

That said, I still have some vintage scopes mounted, a Weaver K12 and an import Redfield 2-7x (?) but both on rifles I either plink/target with, or hunt on clear dry days across open hayfields and pasture where the light is perfect and we are done long before dusk. If a coyote, crow or groundhog gets away because of a wonky scope, who cares?

Finally, for Fudds like me, the huge astronomy optics so common on hunting rifles these days seem a bit much. My biggest scope is a 6-24x, mounted on an F-T/R rifle, and I was underscoped by most of the competitions standards.
I hunt simple 1-4x tidy variables, God forbid several fixed 6x Leupolds, some very Fuddlike 3-9x40mm Leupolds and Burris numbers. I'm trying to talk bamaboy into the loan of a rifle with a 4-16x Burris as a spare rifle for a prairie dog hunt I hope to make and the rifle I intend to shoot most on that hunt (if it happens) wears a fixed 10x. Only the 6-24x is 30mm with a bell of 50mm. Mounted on a .308, seems a bit much for prairie dogs!
 
I had several Redfields, all straight powers. From 4x to 16x, only one I have left is 4x on Ruger 77/22, fine squirrel rig.
 
the windage and elevation knobs do actually move the crosshairs in the opposite direction than what is marked..

Which is also the way you adjust iron sights. You move the sight (rear, normally) in the opposite direction that you want the bullet impact to move.

Back in the old days, the up/down and right/left were marked in the direction you wanted the bullet to go, something most people could learn and remember. The way the sight /reticle actually moved (being the opposite) was what it took to move the bullet strike and most people didn't know, or care about which way it moved, only where the bullet went.
 
Back
Top