Al Gore in Viet Nam article:
http://www.nationalreview.com/22nov99/zelnick112299.html
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>
Soldier Gore
The story of the veep and Vietnam.
by Bob Zelnick
November 22, 1999
Early during the research for my biography of Al Gore Jr., I came across an article on the 1970 campaign in which his
father, Albert Gore Sr., lost the U.S. Senate seat he had held for 18 years. The piece, "The End of a Populist" by David
Halberstam, appeared in the January 1971 issue of Harper's. Halberstam, a former reporter for the Nashville
Tennessean who knew the Gore family well, offers a good contemporary account of why the younger Gore decided to
join the Army despite deep personal misgivings: Young Albert graduated from Harvard this year: he is militantly anti-war
and did not want to go into the Army. But he was faced with a terrible choice: to stay out and avoid the draft in a state like
Tennessee would cost the Senate one of its leading doves. His family told him to make his own choice, that they could not
care less whether Albert ran and won. In fact Pauline [Gore's mother], who is bitterly and militantly anti-war, told young
Al that she would be glad to go to Canada with him.
Canada was, of course, far-fetched; there were plenty of other ways to avoid military service. But in the end, Gore
decided to join the Army in an unsuccessful effort to save his father's seat. Neither in the Halberstam piece, nor in my
own conversations with people who were close to Al Jr. at the time, did a second rationale enter the picture — the altruistic
notion that if he avoided or evaded the draft some other young Tennessean from his home county would be forced to go
in his place. As John Tyson, a Harvard roommate, later said: "He felt by helping his dad and campaigning with his dad
that that was the greatest thing that he as an individual could do to stop the war." Tyson was in a position to know. He
lived near Newark, New Jersey — the site of the recruitment center where Gore enlisted — and was perhaps the last
friend to see him before he raised his hand and joined the military.
Even so, I decided to give Gore the benefit of the doubt when, years later, he told interviewers that the desire to spare
another Tennessee family the anguish of having a son serve in his place had also played a role in his decision. After all, I
reasoned, the fundamental fact was that Gore did volunteer. He did go to Vietnam, and traveled around that country as a
uniformed military journalist covering the activities of his 20th Engineering brigade. He was no grunt, to be sure; but few
volunteers were. The "teeth to tail" ratio in Vietnam at the time was roughly 1 to 4, and during most of the war the Army
simply assigned its draftees to combat while "taking care of its own" with behind-the-lines jobs.
Still, Vietnam was no picnic, even for journalists. Gore traveled around the country in military planes and choppers
that flew low to avoid enemy missiles, in the process making the occupants more vulnerable to small-arms fire. (On one of
my early trips as a freelance reporter, I traveled aboard an old Huey from coastal Nha Trang to Ban Me Thout in the
central highlands. I was surprised to see several of my journalist colleagues lug hardback three-ring binders aboard the
chopper and proceed to sit on them. When I asked what was going on, a trim redheaded Reuters correspondent replied
matter-of-factly, "The bullet doesn't go as far up your ass if it has to pass through a thick notebook.")
Why did Gore go? Over time, he has sought to emphasize the civic motive rather than the antiwar motive. In a recent
conversation with compliant historian Douglas Brinkley, who was permitted to spend several days traveling with Gore
aboard Air Force Two in preparation of a Talk magazine piece, the vice president suggested, "I wouldn't have been able
to walk down Main Street with my head high, without feeling small and guilty," since "it is perfectly obvious that if you
found some fancy way to get out of it somebody would go in your place." Like this reporter, historian Brinkley appears to
have found no contemporaneous Gore statement or letter corroborating this later-recalled sentiment. It may be true, even if
unprovable.
More difficult to understand is how Brinkley left unchallenged a small but revealing bit of revisionism by Gore
regarding his combat record. In March 1988, during his first run for the presidency, Gore described for a Vanity Fair
article his travel to various firebases where members of his engineering company were at work: "I took my turn regularly
on the perimeter in these little firebases out in the boonies. Something would move, we'd fire first and ask questions later."
In a similar vein, Gore told Michael Kelly (then with the Baltimore Sun): "I pulled my turn on the perimeter at night
and walked through the elephant grass and I was fired upon."
Something in these accounts struck me as fishy. Military units usually have their own duty rosters, including guard
duty, and rarely assign those tasks to visitors. Sure enough, my instincts were vindicated when I found Michael O'Hara, a
sportswriter for the Detroit News who had worked and traveled with Gore in Vietnam and was his closest Army buddy.
"We never pulled guard duty in the field because we weren't part of those units," O'Hara told me. "The only place we
stood guard was back at Bien Hoa," the secure base where Gore lived. "It was the equivalent of being a school crossing
guard," O'Hara recalled. "I know guys that didn't even take their rifles with them."
And what is Gore's current version, compliments of the Brinkley article? Brinkley writes that Gore, like other
journalists at Bien Hoa, "had to guard the camp from attack with M-16 automatic rifles strapped to their backs."
"We'd take turns on the perimeter every night," Gore told him, clearly referring to Bien Hoa rather than those little
firebases he recalled so vividly for Vanity Fair, or those elephant-grass firefights he described to Kelly.
There's a conflict between the old and the new versions, as there is on a much broader issue as well. Gore was a dove
throughout the Vietnam War, as was I. Twenty years later, he supported President Bush's decision to go to war against
Iraq, as did I. My conversion began with reports of the murder of unspeakable numbers of Cambodians by their own vile
Communist regime, and a lot of Soviet mischief beginning in the late 1970s. Gore tells Brinkley his own conversion
began in Vietnam. I'm not sure I believe him.Gore says his metamorphosis began when Catholic Vietnamese he met
expressed fear of losing their religious freedom under Communism. "I was still against the war," he says, "but I sure
found out it was a hell of a lot more complicated than I had supposed." But once again, Brinkley delivers no
contemporaneous evidence to sustain Gore's afterthought, a politically convenient one, likely to play well with many
Vietnam veterans.
To the contrary, Brinkley cites — as I did in my own biography of Gore — evidence of an embittered, despondent
young man utterly disillusioned by his country. One friend of the period describes himself and Gore as "two
conscientious objectors in uniform." According to Brinkley, "He turned to philosophical musing and smoking pot, to
loving his family — and distrusting his government."
"After Vietnam I swore that I would never, in any way, go into politics," Gore told Brinkley. Instead, he enrolled in the
Divinity School at Vanderbilt University. He told a friend he wanted to "atone" for his sins. It would be years before he
would recall contemplating the subtleties and nuances that were totally inconsistent with his overt conduct and the
recollections of those close to him at the time. Brinkley seems blithely unaware of the contradiction.
I continue to believe that Al Gore Jr. acted with honor and conviction in volunteering for service in a war he despised,
and in an Army he had described in a letter to his father as a "fascist, totalitarian" institution. To try to save the seat of his
father — a political warrior in the cause of peace — is, in my view, an act of sacrifice and high patriotism, not hypocrisy.
It is also a step that few born to privilege would take, regardless of their convictions. And from all accounts, Gore made a
good soldier. He was well liked by peers and officers, and respected by both. My research produced no corroboration for
rumors circulated by Gore's political enemies that he used the pull of his family or powerful friends to win assignment as
an Army journalist.
Still, I am troubled by Gore's tendency to exaggerate the incidents that form his life as one might airbrush the creases
and shadows of an already decent photographic portrait. I do not regard his boasts of inventing the Internet, or serving as
the model for the protagonist in Love Story, or guarding the perimeter of a firebase in the boonies, as reflecting a deep
character flaw. I see them merely as the expressions either of a man who is not quite comfortable being who or what he is,
or one who is not altogether certain that we are.
And that is bad enough.[/quote]
here is another web article on Al's war record:
http://etherzone.com/yarl101399.html
Who is going to protect him? Certainly not me! 
He talks of how we need more legislation and how we need to hold the gun manufacturers responsible but all that is is a bunch of liberal crap!! You can't hold a manufacturer responsible for the actions of some moron who doesn't educate his children on gun safety and keeps a loaded gun where little hand can get hold of it. We have more than enough laws prohibiting this and banning that as it is! Why not just enforce the laws we already have? Let's take for example the six year old boy who took a gun to school and shot that beautiful little six year old girl. Here is a perfect example of how all the legislation he proposes does absolutely no good! The gun used was an illegally obtained one That some loser crack head left lying around! The boys father! Which brings me to my point. We need parents to take responsibility for their children and their actions! You don't penalize the law abiding citizens whose guns are legally bought and stored properly. That is attacking a symptom and avoiding the problem. That crack head schmuck should be behind bars for life for allowing his gun to reach the hands of that little boy! Not to mention all the other laws he broke. The Colorado incident is another example of parents not doing their jobs. Their kids had websites describing who and how they wanted to kill. And they didn't know? Where the hell were they? Why didn't they know what their kids were doing on the net? Maybe they were just too busy. The bottom line is that parents need to be held responsible. Not everybody else and certainly not gun manufacturers. We as parents need to educate our children and guide them. If we don't we can't expect anybody else to. That is how to keep our children safe. Hillary says it takes a village to raise a child. I say that is crap! It takes loving parents who are active in their lives and teach moralcy, for that is something which cannot be legislated. If we as parents fail to do so then it is the village that suffers! "What about the children!"