Fishing_Cabin
New member
thallub said:So do i. It is very important that the combat veteran have veteran friends he can relate to and who understand what he/she is going through.
When WWII ended in 1945 there were 12 million troops on active duty. By 1950 that number had dropped to 1.5 million. Those veterans took care of each other and i remember them very well. If a guy was having problems his fellow veterans rounded him up and saw that he was taken care of. There was a catchall term for what was wrong with some of those guys-"shell shock". The vast majority of those veterans got over their "shell shock" and did very well in life.
Most veterans filing disability claims today are not vets of Iraq and Afghanistan, they are Vietnam and Gulf War vets.
I would say that local to me, what you describe is more the norm thallub. Generally most of the vets that have an issue can get more help or even an ear to listen, because fortunately some have taken it upon their self to step up and help at times. In my area there are a few guys in VFW/American Legion who know, and are willing to help those in need of treatment from the VA work within the system for the best treatment. That is a good thing.
As to tossing people in to groups as some have suggested...IMO, Trying to classify this or that group in its entirety as being unfit to own firearms without an individual adjudication is completely wrong to me. It's about the individual, and whether or not he/she is unfit or not. Putting people in groups, which carry a penalty or a negative view will only cause people not to seek out help.