Unruly dog not on leash, owner behaving aggressively

I don't live in a ghetto. I live in a liberal enclave comprised mostly of doctors, lawyers, and professors. (They didn't let me in -- my family was here a couple of hundred years before they arrived). I assure you, a person strolling down the road with one golf club in his hand would raise suspicions, and might well result in the police being called to have a chat with the pedestrian.
 
Hi Aguila,

Guess that is the difference in where we live. HERE people in their yards with a gap wedge, chipping, is a common site.

p.s. in all fairness I live 1 mile from a course where the PGA hold annual tournaments.

Guess is like those living next to Whittington. Firearms ARE a common site.
 
Last edited:
Hi Aguila,

Guess that is the difference in where we live. HERE people in their yards with a gap wedge, chipping, is a common site.

p.s. in all fairness I live 1 mile from a course where the PGA hold annual tournaments.

Guess is like those living next to Whittington. Firearms ARE a common site.
His point stands though. This is why pepper spray is popular. Plus its not permanent so if you have to use it on another doggie its not going to hurt that doggie, just drive them off, which is what you want. I have had to do that in the past to drive off a Husky. No one is hurt, except for a strange desire for fajitas...;)
 
Certainly best advice was given to look at criminal law aspects in a given state's code and case law. But one should also consider there could be civil liability as well.
 
luger fan said:
Guess that is the difference in where we live. HERE people in their yards with a gap wedge, chipping, is a common site.
Chipping or putting their yards is a different issue than walking down a public street or road, a couple of miles from home so someone who sees you probably doesn't know you, with a potential weapon in your hand. I've had the police called on me when I was walking, in daylight, in my neighborhood, and I didn't have anything in my hands.
 
luger fan said:
Well since nobody has had a haircut in 2-3 months it probably looks like the Manson family .
If you are responding to my report that I've been stopped for walking in the neighborhood, that incident was in 2000. Barber shops were in full operation, and I don't dress or look like a hippie.
 
Whelp, I'm confounded as to where the edit post button went so here is the supposed video I intended to share:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKfDaUikXlI

It should be the ASP video discussing the first incident with a lawyer and they discuss that legally dogs are considered property and most jurisdictions do not allow for lethal force in defending property. So if Bad Dog attacks your dog and you shoot Bad Dog you are harming another person's property and may not be justified in discharging a firearm within the city limits.
 
Not important to discussion but many yrs ago I was working in the morning in a pharmacy.

The mailman came in kinda laughing about spraying the neighbors dog w/ pepper.
About 5 min later the neighbor came in for supplies to clean the dogs eyes and was not exactly happy.

My Dad was a walking mailman for 35 yrs. He never mentioned any dogs getting it. I know they were encouraged to carry a govt supplied spray.
 
WeedWacker Whelp, I'm confounded as to where the edit post button went so here is the supposed video I intended to share:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKfDaUikXlI

It should be the ASP video discussing the first incident with a lawyer and they discuss that legally dogs are considered property and most jurisdictions do not allow for lethal force in defending property. So if Bad Dog attacks your dog and you shoot Bad Dog you are harming another person's property and may not be justified in discharging a firearm within the city limits.
Not in Texas.
https://www.uslawshield.com/can-i-be-arrested-for-shooting-an-attacking-dog-in-texas/

In fact, Texas specifically recognizes your right to protect your livestock, fowl, or domestic animal against such an attack, but says nothing about humans. The Texas Health and Safety Code says, “A dog or a coyote that is attacking, is about to attack, or has recently attacked livestock, domestic animals, or fowls, may be killed by any person witnessing the attack, or the attacked animal’s owner, or a person acting on behalf of the owner, if the owner or person has knowledge of the attack.”

Does that sound like your domestic animals and livestock have more rights when it comes to dog attacks? It’s because they do. The Texas legislature has declined to remedy this problem in the past, though we can always hope that 2019 might bring some positive change. Fortunately though, Texas provides some protection for your actions through the defense of necessity. This is a defense, not a bar to prosecution, and it has a lot more bark than it does bite.

Boiled down, the Law of Necessity says that your actions are legally justified if you reasonably believe your conduct was immediately necessary to prevent imminent harm, so long as the harm you prevented clearly outweighed the harm you cause, and the law doesn’t otherwise exclude this type of defense. But the defense of necessity is just that—a defense. It must be asserted in court. It may not stop the investigation, your arrest, or prosecution.

Our former Governor, Rick Perry once shot a coyote while walking his dog. Not only was it celebrated in the media, Ruger even made a run of these:

wm_6497751.jpg
 
Back
Top