JT-AR-MG42
New member
Striker fired
Hook,
I am not familiar with the Davis, but am assuming it is a striker fired pistol as opposed to a hammer fired one.
In my limited experience with the 'cheaper' versions of them ( excluding more modern designs like my P99 or the Glock series ) the stiker/sear arrangement is, by nature, rather weak. Springs can take a weakened set and misaligned or improperly treated parts tend to wear quickly.
I just don't believe this sort of handgun was meant to be dry fired much.
I also second the good common sense of the 'shooter' for his muzzle control. It saved a tragedy. Just my take. JT
Hook,
I am not familiar with the Davis, but am assuming it is a striker fired pistol as opposed to a hammer fired one.
In my limited experience with the 'cheaper' versions of them ( excluding more modern designs like my P99 or the Glock series ) the stiker/sear arrangement is, by nature, rather weak. Springs can take a weakened set and misaligned or improperly treated parts tend to wear quickly.
I just don't believe this sort of handgun was meant to be dry fired much.
I also second the good common sense of the 'shooter' for his muzzle control. It saved a tragedy. Just my take. JT