Evading the point
"Only in Massachusetts would you find a law like that."
Are you sure it's only Massachusetts? I suspect there are other states with similar statutes, probably New Jersey, California and Maryland; possibly New York and Connecticut as well.
"I wonder if a locked glove box would meet the requirement?"
Highly unlikely, as it's w/i reach of anyone in the front seats. It's also a stupid place to keep a gun, authorization of that location by certain Southern states notwithstanding.
"...since she (the marshall) wasn’t in Massachusetts at the time of this occurrence and Florida law doesn’t have any requirements like that, she shouldn’t be held accountable to Massachusetts’s idiotic laws."
Irrelevant and specious. You asked if there were any such storage laws; I proved there were. Whether those laws applied to her was not the issue.
"...since she didn’t do anything that would cause a “joe on the street” to face jail time, fine or other punishment, she shouldn’t either."
Tenuous premise to rationalize a poor conclusion. Leaving a loaded gun and ID in a vehicle is not intelligent; it is questionable if the vehicle was even secured, still less that her department-issued property was in the trunk.
If she - or anyone else - was so irresponsible as to leave a loaded gun in sight in an unlocked car, I can easily see civil, and even criminal, consequences.
It's called "negligence." See also "reckless disregard."
"Only in Massachusetts would you find a law like that."
Are you sure it's only Massachusetts? I suspect there are other states with similar statutes, probably New Jersey, California and Maryland; possibly New York and Connecticut as well.
"I wonder if a locked glove box would meet the requirement?"
Highly unlikely, as it's w/i reach of anyone in the front seats. It's also a stupid place to keep a gun, authorization of that location by certain Southern states notwithstanding.
"...since she (the marshall) wasn’t in Massachusetts at the time of this occurrence and Florida law doesn’t have any requirements like that, she shouldn’t be held accountable to Massachusetts’s idiotic laws."
Irrelevant and specious. You asked if there were any such storage laws; I proved there were. Whether those laws applied to her was not the issue.
"...since she didn’t do anything that would cause a “joe on the street” to face jail time, fine or other punishment, she shouldn’t either."
Tenuous premise to rationalize a poor conclusion. Leaving a loaded gun and ID in a vehicle is not intelligent; it is questionable if the vehicle was even secured, still less that her department-issued property was in the trunk.
If she - or anyone else - was so irresponsible as to leave a loaded gun in sight in an unlocked car, I can easily see civil, and even criminal, consequences.
It's called "negligence." See also "reckless disregard."