you're supposed to send the whole thing back to them and they'll screw on a new oil filter and send it back to you. I wonder how many customers actually do that.
The company also restamps the S/n on the new filter. Thats the difference
you're supposed to send the whole thing back to them and they'll screw on a new oil filter and send it back to you. I wonder how many customers actually do that.
So we're looking at $200 shoestrings, eh?biere said:The way it was written, could be interpreted to mean a lot more than a bump stock.
And rubber bands.So we're looking at $200 shoestrings, eh?
44 AMP said:I would remind everyone that Republican Trump was at one time Democrat Trump.
I said it before, and I'll say it again, I believe Trump will do what he believes is best for Trump.
If that happens to be in line with our belief in RKBA, fine.
B. Roberts said:Part of what annoys me about that is that had Obama tried to redefine an accessory as an NFA item after multiple A-OK rulings from ATF, we’d have never heard the end of it. You can certainly make a case that practically that outcome is the best result for NRA given the circumstances. But the blatant hyprocrisy at NRA is getting pretty thick.
Another TV moment that makes a difference only to Don...He is only interested in how any policy shakes out to benefit him.
AB said:So, to paraphrase what they say about Chicago politics, "Write early and write often."
I wonder how effective tweeting is. And I don't say that to claim that it isn't -- I think it's a question we need to answer.Erno86 said:Ya'll can tweet D.J.T.
Activists of all political stripes recommend calling legislators, not just emailing — and certainly not just venting on social media. Several lawmakers, along with those who work for them, said in interviews that Ms. Waite is right: A phone call from a constituent can, indeed, hold more weight than an email, and far outweighs a Facebook post or a tweet.
anygunanywhere wrote: ↑
Fri Jun 07, 2019 9:53 pm
You threw bump stock owners under the bus so you could focus on more important issues. Things that really mattered, at least to the NRA board.
Cotton's reply:
Ignoring the facts is necessary in order for you to make this absurd claim. Bump stocks are important to the people who own them, but that number is tiny compared to the number of people that own AR platform rifles and pistol, AK platform rifles, H&K platform rifles/pistols, etc. That is what was at stake. You and your ilk either don't believe or choose to ignore the tidal wave of calls for another assault weapons ban after the Las Vegas slaughter. I cannot and will not give full details for obvious reasons, but the NRA quite literally saved those firearms from being banned. Yet you want to ignore that fact and essentially claim that bump stocks "were thrown under the buss." Apparently, you would have preferred that the NRA do nothing. The result would have been a new and a much farther-reaching assault weapons band and your bump stock poster-child would have also been banned. You are also ignoring the fact that the bump stock issue is far from over. Ironically, the ATF reclassification of bump stocks may actually bring an end to the BATFE's unlawful usurpation of regulatory authority.
I cannot and will not give full details for obvious reasons, but the NRA quite literally saved those firearms from being banned.
The result would have been a new and a much farther-reaching assault weapons band and your bump stock poster-child would have also been banned.