True stories stopping man or beast

Status
Not open for further replies.

rimfireman

Inactive
Does anyone have a real life experience stopping either man or beast, and what caliber did you use. I am looking to see if size matters. I keep reading opionions, but I would love to see experience. Can a 22 stop anyone or has anyone missed with larger more powerful weapons since they can be more difficult to shoot? Just wondering.
 
Whenever this question arises, I always remember the story in a little town about 10 miles from where I live.

Two guys got into a rukus in one of the rougher bars there and were ushered out of the place by the bouncer and bartender.

Once outside, they both pulled out handguns, . . . one a .357 mag, . . . the other a .22.

The guy who got shot with the .357 died there in the street, . . . the guy who got shot with the .22 died an hour or so later in the hospital.

Conclusion: placement is what counts, . . . not caliber.

May God bless,
Dwight
 
There is the Cop one with a video and everything someone posted about it here a few months ago...

You see the guy get shot a 4 or 5 times with a .357 from the Cop and the BG shot's the Cop with a .22 in the armpit. The BG live's IIRC and the Cop dies because the .22 hit a Main Artiery. Maybe someone can link the storm to this link.
 
I stopped and killed a feral cat with my 1911 and the bullet never entered his body !! He was facing me and the bullet impacted his spine fatally without ever penetrating his skin, just shaved a little fur off. Now do you see why we love the 45 acp ??:D
 
Size might not be as important...

as most people want to believe...

Remember reading a case a few weeks ago LEO stopped a guy for traffic violation... Things got out of control and ended up in big fight in parking lot. LEO pulled gun and shoot BG once in stomach but ended up taking the worst part of the fight... a CCW passer by went to help LEO and shoot BG for times and BG still kept going for LEO... It took a fifth shot (sixth on yhe BG actually) to kill the attacker......

Don't remember specific calibers but I believe LEO was at least .40 and CCW was .45....


Stay safe,

Juan Carlos
 
Size Matters

In my youth I lived and breathed to hunt. Started out with a Daisy bb gun at age six. Graduated to a .22 single shot at age 12. Back then there was no restrictions on youth having guns.

I don't have any idea how many big game animals I have killed, but it is considerable. Thousands of small game and varmints.

However, I have to say this; before you can kill or stop anything, you have to hit it, and it helps to hit it in the right spot. A bullet in the brain or spinal cord in the area of the neck will imediately bring the animal down. And it will almost always stay down, not even a twitch, just plop, down like dropping a wet dish rag.

I have also seen deer run 150 yards with a 30 cal hole through the heart.
That is why I like head shots. You don't have to chase the critter.

I have seen the lowly .22 LR take animals from the size of mice up to elk and 2000 lb. bulls. No doubt in my mind the small calibers can kill.

I have used a number of rifle calibers including .22 LR 22 Mag, 30-30, 222, 243, 30-06, 308, 270, 270 Weatherby Mag, 300 Mag.

I have killed many deer with one shot with the 222 to the head.
I have twice made a body shot on deer with the 222 and both times I wounded the animal and had to track it down The one was hit in the lungs, the other a little too low in the front shoulder. On the shoulder shot, the little pill stopped before getting into anything vital. Now hits like that with the 270 will usually go clear through and knock the deer down immediately. They won't usually get up. Of course the 222 delivers much more energy than the 45 auto. So see what you are up against?

If the animal is already spooked and moving out sometimes you can put a bullet through the heart or lung area and they will run a considerable distance before dropping from lack of blood. In other words if it was coming for you, it would get you before it died.

Though the light loads can kill, it quickly becomes evident that the more powerful loads are better for stopping and/or killing the animal. Absolutely no question about it. Size matters. It is a fact.

I have only owned 22 and 44 Spl revolvers. Let me just say that the 44 is very, very, much more effective, regardless what animal you may be after.

I have never shot at a man, nor do I want to, but I am sure that what I have learned about stopping animals will apply if needed.

My advice: what ever gun you decide to use, learn to shoot! Practice, practice, practice.
 
Quote:
Can a 22 stop anyone or has anyone missed with larger more powerful weapons since they can be more difficult to shoot? Just wondering.
End quote

More difficult to shoot?

I think that most of us are thinking in terms of calibers like 9 mm up to 45 Auto and .40 S&W for carry weapons. From where I stand, I can't see any of these calibers being difficult to shoot or having un-manageable recoil.

A 44 mag could be a bit to much for comfort though. Although if I had to engage in a gunfight or take out a bear at close range, a 44 Mag would be fine with me.

I can believe that some pistols and revolvers might be difficult to handle because of the design of the gun, but nothing to do with the caliber. Try a variety and settle on one that feels good in your hand, has good balance and points good. It should point just as easy as pointing your finger.

Yes, a .22 can stop anyone, *IF* you can carefully place one bullet directly between the eyes of your assailant.
 
JCC2,

a CCW passer by went to help LEO and shoot BG for times and BG still kept going for LEO... It took a fifth shot (sixth on yhe BG actually) to kill the attacker......

Don't remember specific calibers but I believe LEO was at least .40 and CCW was .45....

It was a 45acp. If 4 torso hits with a 45acp and a belly wound from the officers gun failed to stop, why on earth would anyone choose a caliber on the other end of the spectrum........unless it was all they could handle and shoot effectively.

You see the guy get shot a 4 or 5 times with a .357 from the Cop and the BG shot's the Cop with a .22 in the armpit. The BG live's IIRC and the Cop dies because the .22 hit a Main Artery.

A 357 mag in the armpit would have severed the same artery plus smashed other stuff. Shot placement is the key of course. However once your shot placement is the same bigger is usually better.
 
Agreed thatshot placement is the key.....

But....It is a lot easier for most people (stress on MOST :rolleyes: ) to place a shot where they want to if they are shooting a smaller caliber for several reasons, just to name a couple:

- Less recoil of course, allowing for faster/more accurate subsequent shots

- Cheaper cost of ammo (normally) allowing for more practice....

Under equal shot placement, of course Bigger IS Better :D

Stay safe,

Juan Carlos
 
Hits on a badguy in a life and death dual are difficult with any caliber. Just look at the hit ratios for law enforcement while in training and in L&D struggles. I believe the hit ratio is in the 20 percentile range. With stress, moving badguys, obsticles, ect even the better shooters tend to shoot poorly. These are guys many of whom shoot the heavier calibers great under normal conditions.
 
Can a 22 stop anyone or has anyone missed with larger more powerful weapons since they can be more difficult to shoot?
The answer to both questions is "yes". A .22 can stop anyone, and has been shown to be quite adequate for defensive puposes over the years. And some people have missed the shots because they were using a large gun that they could not control. There are no absolutes in the defensive shooting world, only probabilities. So the better question might be "how likely is a .22 to stop an attacker, and how likely is it to miss with a more powerful weapon?"
 
Most folks generally will not discuss their shootings of people in detail on boards like this.

This is true, in general, and I am no exception. However, I will make an exception in this thread.

The first one was with a 1917 loaded with hardball. I fended his bayonet thrust with my weak hand and hit him twice, in the solar plexus and upper chest. He was no longer a threat.

The second one was at about 150 yards with the 03A3. My team was armed with 1911s and 38spl revolvers (and my 1917 .45.) The group we stopped to arrest were armed with rifles. I went back to the car and retrieved the 03A3 and started disabling trucks and drivers. At 1 of ours wounded and 3 of theirs down, they decided to surrender. That was good, as I had only 3 rounds left.

Those are the times I have fired and hit.

The third was not mine, but my son-in-law's father. As local police chief, he served a warrent and the reciepient charged him. His .357 entered the BGs forehead and stayed just under the skin until it exited out the back of his head. Not a serious injury, but the BG decided to lie down, anyway.

Size matters for stopping a threat quickly. Placement counts for stopping the threat at all.

Pops
 
Head shots or wounds....

Regarding armedandsafe´s comment (last para) about a .357 shot to BG´s head with really minor damage, I have heard and read many similar stories all over....

It seems to be that the hardness/shape of the skull bones doesn´t make head shots as effective as one would have thought, unless the shot comes at a very specific angle......

Anyone has any additional info on this subject?

Stay safe !!!!

Juan Carlos
 
Erick, I will look for the source. If some agencies are that high then others must be horrible, if my stats are in the ballpark.
 
I keep hearing folks reference this 20% figure for hits in OISs. Not sure where it comes from.
It comes from SOP9, from New York City, and is a good example of people tossing around numbers without really understanding them. The 20% statement is accurate, and is probably fairly close for a national number also according to research Greg Morrison and I have done, but it probably is somewhat misleading also. Within LE there are many groups and some agencies that have a hit rate much higher (some in excess of 90%) and the lower number also includes instances of obviously unusual incidents that tend to skew the figures, such as a barricaded suspect call where over 1000 rounds are fired.
 
My most harrowing encounter with a frenzied beast was on my paper route one day. I stopped to put the old lady's paper outta the rain. Her 2 pound chiuaha had gotten loose and proceeded to bite the back of my ankle. Luckily I still had the rolled up newsaper which I used like a cricket bat. The dog tumbled head over heels through the air and promptly retreated. My ankle was safe and the dog learned some manners.
 
I agree that the figures are skewed by special circumstances. Still I can't tell you how many times I hear police and suspect exchanging multiple shots without hits. Just recently here in Hillborough County an officer exchanged gunfire and yep missed. Tons just like this only in this area.

An Inverness police officer fired a shot at a fleeing suspect Sunday after the man took something from his back pocket that resembled a gun.

The suspect, Shane Andrew Little, 18, was not hit.

The badguys are even worst it seems.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top