The only reason the M-16/M-4 makes the list IMHO is from the number produced. Not because of the design.
Ever stop to think the two might be related
Or are all people who produce them just hopping on the bandwagon
Anyways....why cant we mix and match!?
The battle for
AK VS M16 Has been drawn out for years. Why cant we just mix them completely...none of this...maybe well change this. Oh how about this. I mean completely combine features.
*Make the magazine well with the m16 type so they can be easily, and quickly SLAPPED into the rifle.
*Use the ar15 type locking lug system so the receiver can still be made out of a light metal.
*Use a piston type ar15, get rid of the gas tube and bcg key and stop $#!tting where you ear mr M16!
*Up the cartridge size to have the "power" of the ak47, to something close to it. Like .308, another 7.62[ar-10 I know...but with THESE goodies] (Uppers are already made)
*Stay with the aperture sights, but with an m4 rail so the rifle can have numerous optics
*You know how windows in some cars are push down a little, it will go up or down till you let go. And if you push hard enough it will click and automatically roll all the way down...why not design a triger around this principle?
*Moly stock, get rid of the wood ak....gettin old IMHO Molys where its at : D
Thts all I got for tonight. Got up at 4:30 and worked a 13 hour shift at the boat yard I work at....people love 4th of july. HAPPY HOLIDAYS ALL!
-dave