The gauge, as a mechanical object may be fine. Its the results that bother me. SO perhaps I should have said something like "the gauge and the way its being used..." or to be inclusive, the gauge, his reload, the way the gauge is uses, AND his gun....
Again, its probably a point of view thing, I make reloads to work in a gun or several guns, not to work in a gauge.
From where i sit, with "about half" of the rounds his gauge use rejects work in his gun. Now, yes, identifying WHY the gauge rejects them is important, so the error can be fixed, but with so many "false negatives" something isn't right.
I want a system that shows me, clearly what does nd doesn't fit in my gun(s). If every round the gauge passed fit fine and every round the gauge failed wouldn't fit, I'd be fine with that, that's the way its supposed to work.
But he said about half the fails in the gauge work in his gun. That's NOT the way its supposed to work. I can't (and won't) say from here exactly what isn't right, but something isn't right.
SO, I amend my statement to "the results you're getting don't fill me with confidence.
