OK, we know that many makers have compact 9s with .40s in the same size, and we know Seecamp recently even packed a .380 auto gun into sub-sub-compact (mouser) somehow. But since I am looking to the future to the smallest 9x19P possible (my personal "minimum" caliber for an all-the-time defense pistol), I want to compare pistols of those makers who have made or are going to make 9mms in the smallest, most concealable package possible, but with at least a 3.25" bbl and 7+1 cap, and forget about keeping the frame large/strong enough to house a .40 in the same frame - that's too much trade-off in size, IMO. I've already got a Glock 27 in .40, which is a great little gun, but I will trade it if I find what I want - an even smaller, and as light or lighter (if possible) than the G26/27.
So has anyone compared or obtained hearsay or tech data, for size/weight, quality, reliability, etc., the following:
1. Steyr "S" Series 9mm - (not yet available I don't think) - I'm thinking they didn't go as small as possible because I believe the S will be offered in a 40 with same external dimensions. But I handled and REALLY liked a Steyr "M" in .40. Anyone know how much smaller the "S" is? And what about the fabled "XS"? Will it be forthcoming?
2. Taurus Millenium 9mm - Do they have a subcompact in this new pistol? Or is is the same size as the .40?
3. Kahr MK9 (I handled this one and liked it a lot but it didn't seem much smaller than my G27 and certainly no lighter).
4. Colt Pocket Nine (I don't think these will even be available since they're not being made).
5. Glock 26 - Yes, I may even consider trading in the 27 for a 26, just for Kb concerns and milder recoil and cheaper to practice with - should I if none of the above satisfy the requirements? If I can't get something that will be small enough to conceal in a large pocket (let's say dress pants), then I may as well stick with the G26 or 27 seems to me, since I'll have to use another form of concealment besides an ordinary pocket.
5. Any others you can think of?
I Thank you quite humbly in advance.
P.S. As a related technical question, I find it interesting that on my P32, Kel-tec has used an novel design in that the hammer decocks (partially) after every shot, which requires a double action pull (which you want in a defense pistol anyway), but which more importantly, allows the spring tension from the hammer (mainspring?) to act as a deterrent to slide movement, helping slow the slide right along with the recoil spring. This allows the recoil spring assembly AND the slide (and therefore the whole gun) to be smaller and lighter. SO, does Kel-Tec do this on their P11 as well? If not, does anyone else currently or plan in the near future to utilize this design in a locked-breach 9mm pistol?
So has anyone compared or obtained hearsay or tech data, for size/weight, quality, reliability, etc., the following:
1. Steyr "S" Series 9mm - (not yet available I don't think) - I'm thinking they didn't go as small as possible because I believe the S will be offered in a 40 with same external dimensions. But I handled and REALLY liked a Steyr "M" in .40. Anyone know how much smaller the "S" is? And what about the fabled "XS"? Will it be forthcoming?
2. Taurus Millenium 9mm - Do they have a subcompact in this new pistol? Or is is the same size as the .40?
3. Kahr MK9 (I handled this one and liked it a lot but it didn't seem much smaller than my G27 and certainly no lighter).
4. Colt Pocket Nine (I don't think these will even be available since they're not being made).
5. Glock 26 - Yes, I may even consider trading in the 27 for a 26, just for Kb concerns and milder recoil and cheaper to practice with - should I if none of the above satisfy the requirements? If I can't get something that will be small enough to conceal in a large pocket (let's say dress pants), then I may as well stick with the G26 or 27 seems to me, since I'll have to use another form of concealment besides an ordinary pocket.
5. Any others you can think of?
I Thank you quite humbly in advance.
P.S. As a related technical question, I find it interesting that on my P32, Kel-tec has used an novel design in that the hammer decocks (partially) after every shot, which requires a double action pull (which you want in a defense pistol anyway), but which more importantly, allows the spring tension from the hammer (mainspring?) to act as a deterrent to slide movement, helping slow the slide right along with the recoil spring. This allows the recoil spring assembly AND the slide (and therefore the whole gun) to be smaller and lighter. SO, does Kel-Tec do this on their P11 as well? If not, does anyone else currently or plan in the near future to utilize this design in a locked-breach 9mm pistol?