training is something that is spoken of but it doesnt seem to be well followed. I mean in the actual range you use a handgun.
the old bullseye manual you see online, is considered "ok to learn grip and trigger control, and sight picture' but not much else. that 20 some yard range is tooo much for someone concerned in ccw shooting.
yet how? if deputy fife and sherriff taylor had to qualify at 25 yards every year to be allowed to be armed, then why is the big standard of today, a mere 15 yards?
all of the reviews only ever mention 7 or 15 yards to "see if a gun is accurate". i mean, if your kimber 2 that cost 1300 out the door is only good for 15 yards...... i think a rossi can do better for you at that range, 400 for the gun and the extra cash for ammuntion and range time.
the old bullseye manual you see online, is considered "ok to learn grip and trigger control, and sight picture' but not much else. that 20 some yard range is tooo much for someone concerned in ccw shooting.
yet how? if deputy fife and sherriff taylor had to qualify at 25 yards every year to be allowed to be armed, then why is the big standard of today, a mere 15 yards?
all of the reviews only ever mention 7 or 15 yards to "see if a gun is accurate". i mean, if your kimber 2 that cost 1300 out the door is only good for 15 yards...... i think a rossi can do better for you at that range, 400 for the gun and the extra cash for ammuntion and range time.