Krustyfats
Inactive
I've been researching and shopping for months for my next gun...and probably the last purchase for a long-while. To fill out my collection I want a 4.5 to 5 inch barrel 9mm semi-auto. (my collection includes Glock 43 for carry, 686 4" Plus for fun , AR15 because, and an inherited Remington Bolt action .22LR) My intended use is to have a very accurate range/competition, and secondary as home defense. Price is a factor $400-800 range This won't be my only home defense gun, but it could surely fill that role as well.
I've narrowed it down the the following:
Walther PPQ 5 inch (9mm)
Walther Q5 Match
CZ P09
CZ SP-01
Smith and Wesson Performance center ported (9L)
*I would consider a 1911 but their capacity has pushed me away.
I've been racking my brain trying to go with one of those above, but just can't make a decision. I'll post my though process below for anyone who may care to read further:
Walther PPQ 5 inch: I like the 5 inch barrel and love the PPQ trigger and ergos. I have fired a 4 inch and handled many PPQs at ranges and stores. The trigger amazes me every time. I don't love the sights, nor the size of the large gap in the rear notch. (can be had for just over $600)
Walther Q5 Match: This comes out of the box with nothing to do to it. Fully adjustable sights, fiber optic front sight. Plus the value of 3 mags and the RMR mounting plates. This gun costs about $200 more than the PPQ 5 inch. I think it might be worth the extra...considering extra mag, RMR mounts, supposedly better trigger, and sights. I have one on order (on a waiting list) at the moment, but am not too keen on spending $800+ on a plastic pistol.
CZ P09: I've never held, or seen one in person, but I have held and dry fired a P07. I like the Omega Trigger. Not quite as much as the PPQ trigger though, but I do like the having the option of DA/SA and having a de-cocker. Just more fun IMO. Barrel length is decent at 4.5 inches and the 19 round magazines are awesome.Sights are standard and aren't adjustable on the-fly for windage like the PPQ. I think you have to use a rear-sight tool/punch/or hammer? Can anyone elaborate? Aftermarket sights are scarce. The beauty on this is it can be had for just under $500 (inclusive of all fees/shipping/FFL transfer etc.) and is reviewed very well.
CZ SP-01: I have only held a few. I didn't like the trigger as much as the P09 or especially the PPQ, but it's still good. I like it being a heavy metal gun with a rail. I'm not a fan of the sights, but I can get used to it. ($650 ish)
S&W M&P Performance Center 9L Ported: I recently sold my M&P 40 because I hated the trigger. I shot my Glock 43 better than I did my full size M&P. I had no interest in S&W plastic pistols anymore until a gun store clerk said to check this out. The trigger was awesome. Almost as good as the PPQ IMO. I like the RMR mounting plates. Don't love the sights, but understand why they are so tall. I like the look of M&Ps as well as the CZs the best. Especially with the extended barrel. My question to the forum (if anyone has read this post this far) is whether the porting actually helps. I have "0" experience with ported barrels and slides. I do understand that it can be prohibited in certain competitions without putting a non-ported barrel. Does porting create any long term issues with the slide? Reliability? How much muzzle velocity is lost? Is it worth it? Can be had for about $700 all-in.
Honorable Mentions:
HK VP9. Almost a PPQ trigger. Great ergos. Nice Sights. No Long slide version. HK sounds cool.
Glock 34 or 17. Good barrel length. Ok sights. (I kind of like Glock sights). Trigger so-so, but no PPQ. Tons of stuff to tinker with, but that can get really expensive really quickly. It's a Glock which is a good gun but quite boring and cliche.
Canik TP9SA. Sweet Trigger and barrel length. Disturbingly cheap and I'm suppose that's for a reason.
Sig P226: Big heavy gun, but big bore axis. Trigger nice in S.A, but I never fell in love. Also above my budget. Having a big metal Sig would be cool though, but who doesn't have one?....i.e..Glock.
CZ 75/85 series: Like the SP-01, the trigger isn't phenomenal. Not having a rail is the biggest negative.
I've narrowed it down the the following:
Walther PPQ 5 inch (9mm)
Walther Q5 Match
CZ P09
CZ SP-01
Smith and Wesson Performance center ported (9L)
*I would consider a 1911 but their capacity has pushed me away.
I've been racking my brain trying to go with one of those above, but just can't make a decision. I'll post my though process below for anyone who may care to read further:
Walther PPQ 5 inch: I like the 5 inch barrel and love the PPQ trigger and ergos. I have fired a 4 inch and handled many PPQs at ranges and stores. The trigger amazes me every time. I don't love the sights, nor the size of the large gap in the rear notch. (can be had for just over $600)
Walther Q5 Match: This comes out of the box with nothing to do to it. Fully adjustable sights, fiber optic front sight. Plus the value of 3 mags and the RMR mounting plates. This gun costs about $200 more than the PPQ 5 inch. I think it might be worth the extra...considering extra mag, RMR mounts, supposedly better trigger, and sights. I have one on order (on a waiting list) at the moment, but am not too keen on spending $800+ on a plastic pistol.
CZ P09: I've never held, or seen one in person, but I have held and dry fired a P07. I like the Omega Trigger. Not quite as much as the PPQ trigger though, but I do like the having the option of DA/SA and having a de-cocker. Just more fun IMO. Barrel length is decent at 4.5 inches and the 19 round magazines are awesome.Sights are standard and aren't adjustable on the-fly for windage like the PPQ. I think you have to use a rear-sight tool/punch/or hammer? Can anyone elaborate? Aftermarket sights are scarce. The beauty on this is it can be had for just under $500 (inclusive of all fees/shipping/FFL transfer etc.) and is reviewed very well.
CZ SP-01: I have only held a few. I didn't like the trigger as much as the P09 or especially the PPQ, but it's still good. I like it being a heavy metal gun with a rail. I'm not a fan of the sights, but I can get used to it. ($650 ish)
S&W M&P Performance Center 9L Ported: I recently sold my M&P 40 because I hated the trigger. I shot my Glock 43 better than I did my full size M&P. I had no interest in S&W plastic pistols anymore until a gun store clerk said to check this out. The trigger was awesome. Almost as good as the PPQ IMO. I like the RMR mounting plates. Don't love the sights, but understand why they are so tall. I like the look of M&Ps as well as the CZs the best. Especially with the extended barrel. My question to the forum (if anyone has read this post this far) is whether the porting actually helps. I have "0" experience with ported barrels and slides. I do understand that it can be prohibited in certain competitions without putting a non-ported barrel. Does porting create any long term issues with the slide? Reliability? How much muzzle velocity is lost? Is it worth it? Can be had for about $700 all-in.
Honorable Mentions:
HK VP9. Almost a PPQ trigger. Great ergos. Nice Sights. No Long slide version. HK sounds cool.
Glock 34 or 17. Good barrel length. Ok sights. (I kind of like Glock sights). Trigger so-so, but no PPQ. Tons of stuff to tinker with, but that can get really expensive really quickly. It's a Glock which is a good gun but quite boring and cliche.
Canik TP9SA. Sweet Trigger and barrel length. Disturbingly cheap and I'm suppose that's for a reason.
Sig P226: Big heavy gun, but big bore axis. Trigger nice in S.A, but I never fell in love. Also above my budget. Having a big metal Sig would be cool though, but who doesn't have one?....i.e..Glock.
CZ 75/85 series: Like the SP-01, the trigger isn't phenomenal. Not having a rail is the biggest negative.