This is cool - CZ Scorpion EVO pistol

About as easy as proving your intent was to build an unregistered SBR.

And therein lies theinability of BAFTE's recent technical ruling to have any effect whatsoever.

Ask any lawyer how easy it is to prove intent.
Click to expand...

Ok, but here's the problem. The lawyer will charge you a minimum of $250/hour just to answer your question. If you want the lawyer to do anything more than answer your question, then get the shovel out and start shoveling your money in $5,000 shovel-loads.

The bottom line: If you have to rely on a lawyer to argue "intent" as it relates to NFA laws, it doesn't matter whether you win or lose, because you are going to lose $10,000 lickety split just in the process.
 
Ok, but here's the problem. The lawyer will charge you a minimum of $250/hour just to answer your question. If you want the lawyer to do anything more than answer your question, then get the shovel out and start shoveling your money in $5,000 shovel-loads.

The bottom line: If you have to rely on a lawyer to argue "intent" as it relates to NFA laws, it doesn't matter whether you win or lose, because you are going to lose $10,000 lickety split just in the process.
Click to expand...

If that is the case, we all better stop shooting our Glocks with two hands, because the law says a pistol is a firearm designed to be shot with one hand.

The ATF has ruled that pistols with the SIG brace attached are still pistols, and that there is no illegal way to shoot a pistol. This latest ruling does not change that.

Now we are all seeing the confusion resulting from poorly-written and unconstitutional laws.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top