The Ruger Conundrum. Settled once and for all!!

Which is the toughest of them all? Mega .44Mag load shooting.

  • Redhawk

    Votes: 6 8.7%
  • Super Redhawk

    Votes: 45 65.2%
  • Super Blackhawk

    Votes: 18 26.1%

  • Total voters
    69
  • Poll closed .
I had a customer when I was smithing who was a state hunter- i.e.- he was contracted by the Dept of Parks and Rec to clear out pigs from state parks where they had taken over.

He has a pet handload that was a 325 grain SSK bullet at about 1425 fps. He shot it out of a Super Blackhawk.

The reason the SBH was in the shop was the recoil took the gun past vertical, and the back of the hammer was cutting his hand on every shot, and his blood had removed quite a bit of the bluing. I reblued the SBH and dehorned the bottom of the hammer.

His experience was that handload shot through every pig he shot, including some 350 pounders. He had never recovered a bullet. He was required to dissect the pig to get the bullet out, as the meat was donated to the local homeless shelter.

I asked him why he didn't go for a rifle, and he said he had to crawl on his hands and knees through manzanita bushes to get close to the pigs, and a rifle was too large.
 
Second, some of the "monster" .44 loads can only be shot in the Redhawk/SRH because of their LENGTH, not because of the "lack" of strength of the SuperBlackhawk. Some of these loads with 300+gr bullets are too long for the SBH cylinder.

Bingo.
 
Second, some of the "monster" .44 loads can only be shot in the Redhawk/SRH because of their LENGTH, not because of the "lack" of strength of the SuperBlackhawk. Some of these loads with 300+gr bullets are too long for the SBH cylinder.

This is not necessarily a true statement.
I have loaded and shot 300 gr bullets from a SBH many times.
It's all in powder choice, seating depth and bullet design.

Some bullets designs will be to long and can not be seated below the canalur without bulging the case mouth which keeps them from cambering in the cylinder.
 
This is not necessarily a true statement.
It is absolutely a true statement, some of them are too long.
.050 is roughly 3% and while 3% may or may not be significant, it is most certainly more;)
 
My only conundrum was whether or not I had made the right choice years ago.:) I had finally settled on the SRH when it first came out and preordered with Ruger for the first one in anything shorter that the 9-1/2" barrel they offered. I'm happy with my choice.

I still remember the day I crawled out of the bed to get to the FFL to pick up the first one built in 7-1/2". It took a handfull of pain meds, but I made it! :rolleyes: ( I was disabled with a bulged L4 that had me bedridden for months):mad:
(Ruger was unable to confirm if it was the first one, but it was in the first batch they rolled out. Must have cost me $300.00.)
I laid in bed much longer and tinkered with the trigger for weeks. The pull is glass smooth and feels wayyyy to light DA to fire, but it's never misfired.:)

No clue as to round count. Sorry.
 
mavracer - please re-read my post.

I stated "Some bullets designs will be to long and can not be seated below the canalur without bulging the case mouth which keeps them from cambering in the cylinder. "

As I said "This is not necessarily a true statement."
The operative word is "necessarily"
 
mavracer - please re-read my post.
by all means please reread what you quoted and what you said.
He said some are too long it is not "necessary" for all to be too long for this to be true.
 
Its hard to compare 3 Rugers since you proabbly couldn't do a load hot enough to destroy any of them. Should have thrown a SW 29 in there too for kicks. :D

Years ago I was pushing loads for my Redhawk with W296 to see how far I could go before signs of overpressure. I concluded that you probably could not stuff enough H110/W296 powder in a .44 case to blow it up.
 
all 3 can take any 44 mag loads its when you get in to the 454 and 480 that its SRH only. ruger will not make a Blackhawk for a 480 or 454 the Blackhawk will not pass rugers safety tests for these calibers, if some one has a super red hawk and super Blackhawk measure the thickness of the cylinders the SRH is thicker. the super redhawk is king in the strength department but I do love the Super Blackhawk Hunter..
 
I wonder how many Ruger revolvers have been blown up by folks who believed that Ruger revolvers cannot be blown up. I have known of at least two.

Jim
 
Super hot .44's? None of the above. Freedom Arms Model 83 (904-33)...

Not really connected to the OP's question, is it.

I've not yet seen a listed Freedom Arms Only load on a box of ammo, mind.

Going back to the poll, it seems that my poor standard Redhawk is languishing in 3rd place. I'd hoped it might make 2nd....
 
Back
Top