Glenn E. Meyer
New member
I'm back. I guess I meant the Glocktalk guys didn't pick on me so much. Sob, Sob, whine , whine 
Also, Herodotus - you keep on writing like I am an anti - bah. I'm trying to set the argument in terms of reasonable rebuttals to the defense against tyranny argument. You plan your debate with cognizance of your opponents attack.
One thing from the persuasion literature, if you make a stupid argument for your cause then later reasonable ones are discounted.
I would like to see that the defense of tyranny argument not fall into that category due to inadequate presentations.
As far as foreign invasion - no offense to anyone but have you done some study of strategy and logistics.
There is no one in the planet in the conceivable future that poses an infantry threat to the USA.
To pose such a threat would take such a tremendous change in the military balance and a long term build up that it would be obvious way before we would be faced with a viable need for guerrilla or militia resistance with our personal guns.
If you want to make this argument for the RKBA, you need a realistic threat assessment.
I'll wait for this.
PS - I'm a major military buff - so know your force levels for this one. But this is way off topic.
Thanks for some more incidents like the Oyster dudes.
Also, Herodotus - you keep on writing like I am an anti - bah. I'm trying to set the argument in terms of reasonable rebuttals to the defense against tyranny argument. You plan your debate with cognizance of your opponents attack.
One thing from the persuasion literature, if you make a stupid argument for your cause then later reasonable ones are discounted.
I would like to see that the defense of tyranny argument not fall into that category due to inadequate presentations.
As far as foreign invasion - no offense to anyone but have you done some study of strategy and logistics.
There is no one in the planet in the conceivable future that poses an infantry threat to the USA.
To pose such a threat would take such a tremendous change in the military balance and a long term build up that it would be obvious way before we would be faced with a viable need for guerrilla or militia resistance with our personal guns.
If you want to make this argument for the RKBA, you need a realistic threat assessment.
I'll wait for this.
PS - I'm a major military buff - so know your force levels for this one. But this is way off topic.
Thanks for some more incidents like the Oyster dudes.