Thunderhawk88
Moderator
And all of this means nothing! Are things getting that bad that the Paulites have to get into "my dog's bigger than your dog" contests now?
Are these graphs a complete sham?
I see it now, since the times on the bottom have changed, thanks for the heads up. That confused the hell out of me. I figured Ron Paul wouldn't be screwing with the numbers since he flashes the donor names and the up to the second amount on his website. GoSlash27, you need to clarify what we're looking at when you post something like that. I thought that was midnight to 10:00 am yesterday, not today. See if you can find a snapshot from back then.IZ - the first graph is not a snapshot, it's the dynamically-updating graph for the current day. The second graph is a snapshot.
I think his claimed $4 million haul from the earlier money bomb is also fraudulent.
Will you apologize publicly when the fourth-quarter FEC reports are released?
I think his claimed $4 million haul from the earlier money bomb is also fraudulent.
Paul has right about 9 million dollars donated so far this quarter. You might hate that fact; not my problem.
As I said, the first chart is a dynamic updating image. As such, it reflects today's donations rather than yesterday's. And tomorrow's chart will be different yet again.
The second chart shows a capture of yesterday's contest (the subject of this thread).
Huckabee attempted to mimic the Paul "money bomb" and lost to Paul. Deal with it.
I think his claimed $4 million haul from the earlier money bomb is also fraudulent.
I have all of my ego plus time and money invested in Ron Paul. (actually Ron Pauls message) and even if he doesn't win, my ego will still be intact and I will sleep good.I really don't have much of my ego invested in any candidate.
The Republicans have dug themselves into a hole. The lost the House and Senate, and are about to lose the Presidency. Instead of trying to fix their problems, and focus on the true enemy (the Democrats), they are somehow focused on Ron Paul and attacking him.
The Republicans, I predict, will lose the presidency, and when they do, will somehow try to blame it on Ron Paul, a man they marginalize, and say has no supporters.
I pointed you to both campaign's official donation tickers. I'm not clear on what your problem is with them.I asked for links showing the hard data that went into the chart you provided. At no point on the 20th, or since then, has it accurately reflected Huckabee's money raised, or Ron Paul's.
The Republicans have dug themselves into a hole. The lost the House and Senate, and are about to lose the Presidency. Instead of trying to fix their problems, and focus on the true enemy (the Democrats), they are somehow focused on Ron Paul and attacking him.
I pointed you to both campaign's official donation tickers. I'm not clear on what your problem is with them.
Is it that the official campaign site tickers don't break down the donations on a day-by-day basis? If so, you'll just have to run an experiment to assure yourself that the auto-updating charts are accurate by checking them over time. Same method that you'd compare your trip-odometer to your odometer if you doubt it's accuracy.
Of course, I have a strong suspicion that you know all this and are being intentionally obtuse. If that's the case, you'll have an unequivocal answer when the FEC reports come out
I suppose we'll find out when the FEC reports come out if the *official* ticker on the *official* campaign website is lying.I think you're the one being deliberately obtuse here.
I did point you to a website showing the "hard data".
http://www.ronpaulgraphs.com/rp_vs_huck_nov_20.html
I also linked you to the sources for the numbers.
What, exactly, are you having issues with?