The whole concept is to have a completely non-sexual environment. I don't see why it's wrong to exclude gays or women from this. I have no problem with either, and in fact I am extremely fond of women. It just makes sense that if you want an environment where no sexual acts will be taking place, and severe problems would be caused if they did, you want to remove most possibility. After many molested boyscouts during the 80s and early 90s, it's become quite an issue.
I would put this akin to banning guns from nightclubs. Nightclubs are places that if guns are brought into, there is an inherently high factor of problem, including theft of weapon, loss of weapon, accidental, and even purposeful discharge, of the weapons. Add to this the presence of alcohol and it becomes clear that its not a good place to have weapons. I think most people understand that, even most of the fervent pro-gunners, such as many on TFL. Why can't the liberals just accept that there are places where their idealogy just doesn't fit either? I don't get why they have to keep pushing their platform and being so unreasonable. I guess if they were reasonable, they wouldn't be liberals, so what should I expect?
------------------
I twist the facts until they tell the truth. -Some intellectual sadist
The Bill of Rights is a document of brilliance, a document of wisdom, and it is the ultimate law, spoken or not, for the very concept of a society that holds liberty above the desire for ever greater power. -Me