I quoted your claim from your post. For that matter, so have you--at least three times now.
In addition, you have also stated that you "can show the same thing backing my points"--that you can support the claim.
Metal god said:
...my guess is this shooting will not get the coverage it needs because it appears to reinforce the pro gun side on every level . Any gun can be used to carry out these types of attacks , Armed personnel in schools will help defend and mitigate the damage , only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun
The highlighted claim is false. If there were really any doubt, the Indiana school shooting where an unarmed good guy stopped a school shooting by tackling the shooter should have eliminated it.
I can't help it if some read more into it then was actually written .
If that were what was happening, it would, indeed be a problem.
Obviously that is not what happened. You not only wrote it, when you were called on it you then stated you could support the points you made--including the false claim. Then, on top of that, you have, in each of your last three posts quoted your original post, thus reiterating the claim.
I get that wasn't the main point of your post, but the idea that it's acceptable to make incorrect claims as long as the main point is correct doesn't fly.
Giving a treatise which correctly explains orbital mechanics and the structure of the solar system but that includes the claim that the moon is made of green cheese is still problematic even if the main point and all of the rest of the discussion is still correct.
It remains problematic even if the person asserts that their main point has nothing to do with the composition of the moon and that they weren't the originator or primary promulgator of the green cheese moon theory.
Repeating/reasserting/defending obviously false claims hurts our cause. We are supposed to be the side of this issue that bases arguments on facts while the other side is the one that appeals to emotions, spins facts and relies on sound bites and catchy but incorrect slogans.