Tea party patriots co-founder arrested on gun charges at nyc airport

No, there is a right to travel freely from state to state at will and nowhere is it written in the constitution that one must leave fundamental civil rights behind.
Click to expand...

If the issue concerns firearms as a fundamental right, whether you leave your state or not, your civil rights are being violated, at least in theory and likely in reality. In theory, the government that established said rights is in conflict with them.

Hermannr,

Your definition of "destination" doesn't even fit common vernacular.

If you're from Washington state, headed out on a 10 day trip and someone asks "Where you going?", you don't say "Washington!" You tell them, "Couple days in Denver, then off too Houston...."
Click to expand...

Right. When you leave your home to travel on business, vacation, etc., your destination isn't home. If it was, then you would not be leaving, LOL.
 
No, there is a right to travel freely from state to state at will and nowhere is it written in the constitution that one must leave fundamental civil rights behind.
Click to expand...

The definition and extend of those "fundamental civil rights" is what is being 'explored' in light of the recent 2nd amendment cases from SCOTUS.

o form criteria has been established for what level of intrusion is allowed (strict scrutiny, compelling interest, etc.).

While there are may years of jurisprudence for the 1st and 4th amendments, there is barely any on the 2nd.
 
He may well have; it would give him standing for any and all appeals. A lawyer and political middle-heavyweight would make for a very good test case for SAF, etc.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top