rickmelear
New member
Own both, prefer the TCP. Like Bill, prefer the P32 over either
Carl the Floor Walker wrote:
...if I really liked the way that particular gun shot and the Price was reasonable and I needed one in that caliber,...
No Custom, no II, "Improvements" that were unnecessary just to appease the marketing department. Be it BUG, or EDC, a pocket pistol is not a target gun, competition gun, or meant for precision shooting. They don't need "good" sights, or tricked out triggers. But marketing has to comply with potential customers that have that misconception.The original LCP is a fantastic gun and all you need from a pocket pistol.
I have the custom too. It's a great little gun, very reliable. If I'm running out the door it's in my pocket.I got rid of a Kahr CW380 because if reliability issues and bought a Ruger LCP 'Custom' after the LCPII came out. I paid $230 out the door and it has been flawless after 150 rounds.
"My local range rents basically all of the .380 micro compact pistols on the market – Kahr, Diamondback, S&W, Kel-Tec, SIG, Ruger, AMT, Magnum Research, Colt, etc., etc. They’re popular rentals and popular sellers...they tell me the TCP is the most reliable pocket .380 in their rental case. Their renter has over 10,000 rounds through it with no breakages. None of the other contenders can claim that."
Which would you buy as a backup? I'm not a cop,just a reg. dude.
I LOVE saving money!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THIS! ^^^Neither for me. I'd get a Gen 2 of the original LCP. Not a custom, but the one with a better trigger and slightly bigger built in sights. The trigger feels the same as the custom and they don't have the giant gaudy sights. Also, the original LCP has way more accessories available than the custom or the LCP II.
This has been my experience thus far. To say I'm happy with this small pistol would be a gross understatement....my Remington RM380 performs flawlessly.