Lashlarue said:
why are the Glock people in denial!
I am not in denial, I fully admit that Taurus makes some bad guns!
You did a fine job of defending Taurus right up until you started throwing bombs at other manufacturers which is known in the business as "Deflecting", my kids do that all the time too:
Me: Did you hit your sister?
Son: I saw her sneaking a cookie out of the cookie jar.
Me: [Puzzled look on my face]
Daughter: No, I didn't!
Son: Yes, you did!
Daughter: No, I didn't!
Me: Where is your mother?
If the value of your gun is based on the [poor] value of other guns, then your gun has got issues! As far as gun magazines giving high praise, I also saw a favorable write up of a Hi-Point in a major gun magazine, not gonna run out and get one of those either. Advertising revenue is the driving factor in the majority of articles you read in the major magazines. Trust me, I like the glossy photos as much as the next guy, but I also take what I read with a grain of salt. I owned a Taurus PT-92 in the past, I had zero problems, I would own one again but I have seen two pistols blow up at the range, both were Taurus' (Both were Millennium's, one a .40, I don't recall the other caliber). I have never seen a Glock blow up despite shooting thousands of round through 4 of them and being around 100's of other Glocks on the range. I also have heard nothing but horror stories from people about Taurus customer service and this thread seems to bear that out. I am glad you have had a good experience with your Taurus, but I think that "friend of my uncles cousin" might have actually been on to something.
For the record, anytime you start off a post with "friend of my uncles cousin", your credibility is going to take a beating. Just saying.