The 686 is a terrific weapon, but if it doesn't "fit" you, you probably won't be happy with it. The Ruger GP series are excellent revolvers also, just not as nicely finished as the 686 and trigger, IMHO, is not quite as light as the Smith. I have one of each, so am speaking based on personal experience and observation. I like both and would have a hard time parting with either.
That said, I also have a Taurus Ultralight. Trigger pull is similar to Ruger. The fit and finish is very good. It also goes "bang" every time I have pulled the trigger. Accuracy wise, I think it's pretty close to my model 60 (Smith 2" 5 shot .357).
I suggest that you also give the Ruger a fair shot and then decide. Go with whatever "feels" best to you.
One last note. I had to have my model 60 serviced. Smith turn around was excellent. Had it back in 10 days. Ruger's turn around on an auto loader was somewhat slower, but I had returned it in the middle of hunting season, probably a peak time for repairs. Have not had a reason to sample Taurus service.
That said, I also have a Taurus Ultralight. Trigger pull is similar to Ruger. The fit and finish is very good. It also goes "bang" every time I have pulled the trigger. Accuracy wise, I think it's pretty close to my model 60 (Smith 2" 5 shot .357).
I suggest that you also give the Ruger a fair shot and then decide. Go with whatever "feels" best to you.
One last note. I had to have my model 60 serviced. Smith turn around was excellent. Had it back in 10 days. Ruger's turn around on an auto loader was somewhat slower, but I had returned it in the middle of hunting season, probably a peak time for repairs. Have not had a reason to sample Taurus service.