Taurus Good or Bad????

Russ5924

New member
Tried to find the info by searching but will be here all night.Just how good is the new Taurus Revolvers. Have S&W and Rugers and One Taurus 941 that I think not to much of :barf: .They do have a few guns that look very nice but for the most part have stayed away from them.What I am saying is in general are they a good handgun.What I get from most is they say the older ones were junk the the newer ones seem OK???????????? HOW OLD :confused:
 
Taurus have good prices, I've never heard a bad thing about the revolvers, the warranty is excellent.

Don't know about the age factor, but I'd buy a new one to begin with, they are relatively inexpensive.
 
all were bought new and were repaired for free under warranty within about 2 months time each.
M44 with 8 inch barrel---rear sight crooked from factory
Raging bull 454-- bolt failure after round number 5.
mod 85 airlight---firing pin spring failed after 50 rounds
22 tracker--excellent gun so far
m44 snubbie--excellent, best dao gun i have ever fired.
do you like roulette, place your bet and spin the wheel!
 
I have a new stainless Taurus Tracker 44 mag. 4" Barrel i,m running in.

Weapon weighs 34 ounces . I,ve so far pushed 50 to 60 rounds through her and not a problem. Shoots ok.

I,m only going to change grips , because I,ve have large hands and sometimes magnum recoils ' trigger houseing raps middle finger. Hougue will be produceing grips for this model sometime in 4/05 according to their e-mail to me.

There is talk of problems with Taurus revolvers falling apart or hanging up.
In general from what I,ve read' Taurus quality up to 1995 was very poor but after this year they straightened their act up.

We'll good luck on your choices. I,m content so far with the one I purchased.
 
Right now I'm sitting 50/50. The .44sp that I have, about 500 or so rounds through it, no problems.

.357 with concealed hammer: Cylinder bound (this was within the first 25 shots) and the trigger was really bad. I called Taurus and they were more then willing to repair it but I really couldn't get a liking for a no hammer revolver so I just sold it.

Wayne
 
Last edited:
627 7shot 357mag

My 627 7shot 357mag 6.5" stainless is nice. I liked it more than the smith and wesson of the same type . It had better sights and a muzzel brake, and cost less.
I am however in the process of tradeing it and my s/w 642 38spe. snub with crimision lazor j-boot grip for a dan wesson pistol pack in 357mag. to cover both hunting and ccw :D
 
My Taurus experiences have been 100% good. My M44, M66, M85 and the old 4" 38 Special with cylinder engraving in the flutes were all fine. I have had NO problems with any centerfire Taurus revolver. The 94/941s I have tried did have extraction issues and left me cold towards Taurus rimfires. I have not tried the new Tracker 22s. The Taurus semi-autos have been fairly pitiful. I am going to try their 1911 clone though. Taurus is a good buy and their steel revolvers are as good as any.
 
i had a tracker 425, titanium. it was a nice gun, it just didn't seem solid enough to me, so i got a ruger redhawk instead.

it wasn't a bad gun, just not the one for me. i will say that the gun store i traded it in to, they had absolutely no trouble getting rid of it.
 
Taurus has gotten better...

My M66 (7shot 357) has been a real champ. (M66B6)
I did have the cylinder release button work its way loose, but, nothing I couldn't fix with a drop of loctite.
(I have had release button screws work loose on S&W as well...same fix in the end)

My 608SS4 has been great for the first 200rds. I sent it off to have the cylinder machined for moonclips. ($85 including S&H)

I have shot the PT99 and PT92. The SS models seem to "work themselves loose", but, these were VERY old items that have seen over 10K rounds of practice ammo through them.

A buddy of mine just got his Raging Bull 454 back from Taurus. (3 weeks)
They redid the forcing cone and replaced the Cylinder. I guess there was something wrong that it didn't rotate properly after he had gone through a box of 45lc with VERY soft lead. (surplus cowboy loads...) Anyhow, they fixed up the forcing cone and he says everything works fine.

The biggest problems I have seen is either owner abuse (REALLY HOT LOADS!!!) or lead bullets that leave behind alot of material. The forcing cones, as of late, have been terribly tight. I (or someone) should fire off an email to them about this.
 
M62 .22lr Carbine (based on the Winchester Model 62) has been an absolute dream to own and shoot. It is extremely accurate, well made, and so much fun.

M85 revolver (plain jane blue, no fancy features) has been perfectly reliable.

These are my only Tauri. My personal opinion is that their recent (Y2K+) .38spec snubbies are perfectly reliable for CCW. If I were thinking of .357mag, I move up to a Ruger or S&W steel handgun. There seem to be plenty of happy PT92 owners and 24/7 owners.
 
I recently picked up a Taurus 608 (8 shot .357) with a 3 inch barrel and fixed sights. They don't make this barrel length anymore and the new 608 has adjustable sights. This is also my first Taurus and I wanted to use it as my CCW even though it's pretty big (built on an "N" frame).

I've fired about 100 rounds through it right now. After the first 50, the cylinder started dragging on the forcing cone. I was shooting some old LSWC rounds, though, and a quick wipe of the forcing cone cleared things up. So, 100W is right on the money about the forcing cone problem and apparently it's nothing new because this gun was made in 1997. In all fairness, those rounds would have probably done the same thing to my other .357s also.

The trigger feels a little rough, but then again, I'm comparing it to my S&Ws and one Ruger. I'm hoping with more shooting, it'll smooth out some. If not, I might have a Smith polish up some stuff on the inside and see how that helps.The trigger is also very wide compared to anything else I've shot. It takes a little getting used to, especially with smaller hands.

The blueing is top notch and cylinder lock-up is as tight as can be. It feels well made and gives you the impression that it's built like a tank. The fixed sights are a hair off but not bad enough for me to send it back to them. I've found out that after market wood grips are impossible to find unless I go with the Hogue fancy series of wood grips, but spending 100 bucks for grips seems like a waste of money on a 250 buck gun. Grips for the snubbys and medium frame guns are easy to find, though.

I also wish Taurus had a way to email them, but I couldn't find anything on their webpage. Most of the grip companies list other large frame guns but none for the 608. I'm sure Taurus used this frame for other guns and finding grips would be easier if I knew which ones.

Would I buy another one? Probably, if the right deal came along.
 
Hi Russell Rindfuss,

To me, there is nothing worse then buying cheap as a compromise to save a few dollars. Your post sounds like you aren't too thrilled with Taurus yourself and are looking to be talked into buying another one. Why not spend a very few dollars more and get a used S&W, which Taurus is a clone of anyway. Better gun, better resale value, better purchase. If, on the other hand you are jonesing for a Taurus, god only knows why, get that then, but why play roulette with your revolver choice? S&W used models are about the same price as a new Taurus anyway. :confused:
 
I'm on my fourth Taurus handgun (85, PT92/99, and now a 445), and they have been uniformly reliable. While a bit rougher than S&W's or Berettas, they are great values for the money. I don't see myself giving up the ones I now own.
 
happy with taurus

I have the taurus 605 .357 snub, about 500rnds thru it. very reliable and good trigger. I would buy another with no reservations.
 
My 6 inch .357 shoots into 1.5 inches at 50 yards with target .38 spl ammo. my snubby empties the cylinder into the eyebox in 5 seconds two-handed at 20 feet.

No problems with either. :) :) :)
 
I have an older Taurus 441 in .44 Special that has about 500 rounds through it and it has been very reliable and accurate.
 
My Taurus Model 80 .38 Special has been 100% reliable for over 20yrs. and has seen thousands and thousands of rounds.
 
Happy with my Tauri so far....they've have all worked flawlessly (3 of them), but then again I haven't put them through the ringer. Weird that Taurus quality seems such a mixed bag, even with recent guns, if you believe the internet anecdotes.
 
I have owned a Taurus 9mm, shot very accurate, but I thought the grips were a hair big. My buddy bought it and loves it. Bought a PT22, had several problems with jamming, still think it was piece of junk.
I still own a Taurus 85 stainless in .38 special. Great gun very dependable. I am even thinking about about buying one of the new Taurus full size 9mm since they thinned out the grips.

I think Taurus makes a great gun. The .22 is the only exception.
 
Back
Top