lee n. field said:
Thoughts: The magazine is straight. The body is curved. In order to accomodate a straight magazine in a curved body, that body has to be thicker than it has to be in (say) Taurus' own TCP.
True -- but it's thicker on one side and thinner on the other, and the total width around the mag isn't much more than you find in other guns. (The thickness of of the grip in other guns isn't really dictated by mag size -- which can be quite thin in a single-stack gun -- but by needing a grip that is somewhat comfortable when the gun is fired. In some ways, the "curve" of the grip fits a right hand well: it fills the "bowl" of the hand you see when you start to close your hand when gripping something.
The design can be easily flipped to a left-handed version by a different poly cover over the grip frame and base plate. The slide and upper assembly is basically neutral. An integral light is nice, and I think a LASER is optional (not standard); having both in a modestly-sized package is interesting.
Taurus has a terrible reputation, but some of their smaller guns seem to run without a lot of problems... maybe what they've learned with some of those guns has been applied, here.
Copies of the patent with drawings, etc, are floating round the internet. I don't know how Taurus got a patent on what basically seems to be a grip frame poly cover and mag base plate; that appears to be all that's really different about the gun. (I expect that patent, if it's been awarded and is not just "pending", to be challenged by other gun makers.)
(The belt clip, by the way, is detachable -- user choice. It's included in the width measurements you usually see, so it adds a bit to the width. I'd think that IWB will be the most popular mode of carry. You'd want to take that clip OFF if using a pocket holster. The square/slightly curved shape would be less obviously a handgun than some pocket gun, even if they're in a holster.)