Taurus 2010, revolvers, autos

Hi,

This is a post that questions the most recent state of Taurus Firearms. Trying to understand the quality in these firearms as early as two years ago, to the present, and the future of the company.


Currently, I'm under the impression that these firearms are less than desirable, function inconsistently, and for the most part are knock offs of other designs.

Is that a correct assessment? Is that just, "internet hearsay."

Your thoughts please, on the most recent products from Taurus. Lets explore both revolvers and semi-autos.


Thanks...
 
Focusing on revolvers, and researching this pretty heavily of late for reasons I'll go into in a moment, I think Taurus CAN build a decent gun, but don't ask them to do anything "edgy".

In other words, in a small frame (J-class) stick with 38Spl and plain blue or stainless - not "ultralight" in aluminum, magnesium or titanium. And not 357.

In the medium frames, 357 works fine. NOT 44Magnum. Don't even think about the 44 until you get into the "Raging" size frame.

Why I've been looking at this...bit of a long story, I'll compress it to the max.

A guy on thehighroad.us bought a 605 (snubby J-class 357, exposed hammer, 2" barrel) brand new, paid about $350. Shot it around 150 times, mixed 38 and 357, it broke on him - wouldn't latch the cylinder closed.

He sent it off to Taurus (paying shipping), gets it back, it breaks again. He got so ****** off he posted to thr.us "first Arizona resident wants this damned thing, come get it, I'm done with Taurus".

So I says "ooooh, cool, free gun!"

:)

Yeah, I got it. Called Taurus, explained everything, they paid shipping both ways this time. But meanwhile, in examining it closely before they picked it up (literally the same morning Fedex was supposed to come) I realize that the trigger was sticking out sideways from the triggerguard slightly - not a lot but at least 2mm - 3mm range. Enough that on re-holstering with a tight kydex holster, you might crank a round off. I quickly call Taurus and add this to the complaint both on the phone and on the paper slip I include with the gun.

They kept it about three months before finally deciding it had to be scrapped. They also explained they were out of 605s.

I did some rapid, heavy googling and browsing of Taurus' site, looking up MSRP on various guns and then reading reports on same.

I asked them to send me either a blue 850 (fully concealed hammer aka "CIA") or 851 (their version of the S&W Bodyguard, shrouded hammer, both 38Spl snubbies rated for +P.

They sent an 850 overnight.

This is a 23oz gun - it's all classic plain steel. Got it yesterday, haven't shot it yet. But I did one very thorough "checkout" and it passes. Barrel gap is around .005 give or take a thou, tiny bit of endshake (barely detectable) that shouldn't be a problem, everything else is quite good including shockingly enough the trigger.

Before telling Taurus to ship me this puppy, I did some serious searches on this forum and others as to what Taurus guns are getting the complaints. The plain blue or stainless 38 snubbies are almost never getting trouble reports.

I have a partial theory as to what's up here.

In most countries in Central and South America, laws put serious limits on the energy levels of bullets owned by citizens and security guards. Mexico seems to have pioneered this with the idea of banning "military ammo". I know Argentina, Brazil and Peru have all done this at various times. I suspect the plain-jane 38s are being sold in the local South American market while the 357s on up and "exotic alloy" stuff is made more or less exclusively for the US market.

The other thing is, obviously, they can get the basics right more often than they can get higher-end or higher-pressure stuff right.

So. I suspect this 850 will make somebody a nice little carry piece. It's not "flashy" but it has enough weight and toughness to make adequate practice practical and will otherwise "git'r'done".

And that's the kind of gun somebody shopping on a budget should be looking for.

I strongly suspect this applies to autos as well...
 
Taurus, above all the internet hype, seems to have pretty spotty QA and customer service. Is every Taurus a lemon? No, there are people that swear by them. Is every Taurus great being bashed unfairly? No, they do seem to have more than their fair share of problems.

From a personal side, I've owned one Taurus, bought 2 years ago NIB, it was a Model 85 snubnose. Around 200 rounds it, it seized up tight. I no longer own it, nor will I ever own another Taurus.

Would I suggest a Taurus. No. I just feel there are better options out there for what it's worth.

As for the future of Taurus their niche in the market is making inexpensive guns. Don't see that changing.
 
Have a pt 101 , only thing that ever happened to it was I dropped it and broke the rear sight, my fault. called them up and 3 days later I had a new sight no charge. I've had this gun for 7 years now and I dont think It's jamed more then 3 or 4 times. Now I'm looking at the new 1911's:)
 
Taurus is far from being a complete junk gun maker- they're a world above the Jennings/Bryco/Lorcin sort of thing and light years better than RG. Still, though, many of their guns work perfectly and shoot well and some of them have issues. Some of those who get guns with issues get cared for quickly and everything gets squared away, others wait for months only to discover the problem wasn't fixed.

Every gun manufacturer can churn out a problem gun (and they do), and every one of them can even fall down in taking care of the problems. However, that is generally not the rule. With Taurus, it seems like it happens more often than other makers- most of their guns are just fine, but it seems that the chances of issues might be higher.

Just sayin'.

Taurus also has a huge catalog- they make an extremely wide range of guns with a massive number of variants. They seem to have precious little pause at striking out on their own to do something new and different (The Judge). They are often quick with product announcements (even if production examples don't show for a while).

They like to think outside the box, and that's good, but I think that a little emphasis on quality control would do them a world of good.
 
QC cost money

You get what you pay for.

I own 1 Taurus. It will be the only one I ever own. I'd rather spend a little more and get a whole lot more.
 
Taurus is pumping out handguns like crazy.

They are challenging other makes by uncutting their competitors prices by at least 10 to 20% on some models.

Have there been some quality control problems?

Sure.

Taurus has initiated a new quality control initiative that I hope is actually more than just a feel good move.

I have owned three Model 85's and a PT101 stainless that was absolutely one of the most beautiful handguns I have ever owned.

I presently own a Ultralight Model 85 (my third 85).

No problems with any of them.
 
Last edited:
I see some pretty good "dislike" of Taurus above and its backed by facts so i cant argue with it,even tho i do like Taurus products.
I own 2 Tauri currently and both have funtioned flawlessly.
Both of mine are autos as thats all i buy and use,so i cant speak for thier revolvers.
I can add Colt has some major issues going on with thier 1911's and yet my PT1911 works flawlessly.Im not saying Colt is junk by any means,im saying everyone has issues at one time or another.
Currently, I'm under the impression that these firearms are less than desirable, function inconsistently, and for the most part are knock offs of other designs.
To answer the first part id say some people dont like them,some dont care and some do like them.Percentage wise they bring a trade in value in the same percentages other guns carry.
I find my Tauri's function very consitantly.I cant think of one auto thats a knockoff design.The PT1911 is built to 1911 specs but is no one's knockoff.
If you mean the PT92 wich is the old Beretta i believe they bought the rights to that gun,and believe it or not many feel the Taurus is the superior maker between the 2 on that model.
 
Taurus and the like

Raurus has done me right, I own two. There are people out there that bad mouth Taurus and haven't even owned one.
 
Taurus model 44

I had a Colt Trooper in 4inch 357 model and would say that my Taurus out of the box had just as nice of a trigger and I love the ported barrel, can't beat em for the best bang for the dollar. I even love my Rossi 971VRC

100_0460.jpg
 
I own several Taurus handguns.

605 - 2" steel .357 (5-shot) magnum that kicks pretty good.
617 - 2" titanium ported .357 (7-shot) that is great to shoot.
Raging Bull .454 Casull
1911 (actually I gave this one to my dad)

I have never had a problem with any of them. I've called Taurus tech support once, and was on/off the phone in no time at all with a very prompt answer for my question.

I know that people have had problems with some guns from Taurus. It seems to me that most tend to be with the model 85 and 605. My 605 has been perfect, but if I were to look for another, I give it a real good inspection before buying it, simply because of the experience of others. My Raging Bull, however, I think is one of the finest handguns ever made. I'd put it up against anything made by Ruger or Dan Wesson (the other two companies that make very fine magnum revolvers -- I haven't used one of the S&W X-frames yet... maybe they should be in this list too)

Any gun maker can go through a period of quality problems. I'm sure Taurus went through one. So has Kimber, Winchester, and others over the years.

I have a Glock 36 that gave me a world of problems a few years ago. I had a Walther PP that had a safety break. My Beretta 3032 jammed like crazy when it was new. That said, these companies are all fine handgun manufacturers. I think Taurus is, as well.
 
My Personal Assessment

I think Taurus is a fascinating manufacturer. I'm speaking primarily to their autos as I've only owned two revolvers - a 94 2" and a 905 SS -- both performed well but the quality did not match Smith in my opinion...however, neither did the price, which is why I opted for the Tauri.

Regarding their autos, they make a worthy 92 clone and their first "original" auto design is very Beretta-Like in design and I've been impressed with the quality and performance of the 900 series autos.

I think their problems came with their 1st and 2nd generation polymer pistols. Their modern designs I think are innovative: the 24/7 Pro series has an extremely fast trigger and is one of the most ergonomic pistols out there. A lot of Taurus haters have no idea what a great performer this pistol can be. Every time I talk to a brand snob I tell them to hold my 24/7 Pro and they stick their nose up at me. Then they hold it and go "oooh, that feels really good. Wow, that shoots fast and accurate..." Throw in the fact that they are the only manufacturer to forge slides out of Titanium and you have another great innovation. Their new 800 series is a nice polymer alternative to a striker fired system. Their 845 in my opinion is an awesome sleeper pistol for under $500 -- 12 rounds of a .45 that is light weight and fits your hand well! I am looking forward to shooting the 709 this weekend. There are only a handful of other manufacturers that make a slim compact Nine and for $350-$375 how can you not try one out?

I think Taurus makes diamonds in the rough -- but the rough has been tough for them to overcome public opinion on. I'm the type to try the firearms out for myself though and not just poo-poo a pistol because my neighbor or the guy behind the counter says to.

This being said, I am not blind to the QC issues, but they are not as bad as many imply. Most manufacturers produce a ratio of 90% gems and 10% lemons. I'd say Taurus with their large volume falls in at 85% gems and 15% lemons. If you get a lemon, send it back to Taurus for repair or replacement -- whether you are the first owner or not. And if someone whines that their service stinks, well, my experience with Taurus CS was FAR better than my recent experience with Smith & Wesson.
 
I only have one experience with Taurus, I bought a PT 845 and SO FAR it has functioned flawlessly. Others though have alot of problems with a number of their firearms. Just reading the "Complaints" section of taurusarmed.net makes me shake in my boots every time I take it to the range, lol. All kidding aside it DOES seem that their QC/CS leaves alot to be desired, at least from all the complaint posts out there. Here's to hoping my PT845 continues to work properly and i'll never have to find out. :D
 
Every time I talk to a brand snob I tell them to hold my 24/7 Pro and they stick their nose up at me. Then they hold it and go "oooh, that feels really good. Wow, that shoots fast and accurate..." Throw in the fact that they are the only manufacturer to forge slides out of Titanium and you have another great innovation.

The only Taurus poly handgun I ever owned (or will own) was a brand new 24/7 Pro. Within a week after purchase it started having trigger reset problems. Taurus kept the gun for 11 weeks before it was returned - but at least it was repaired. I traded it away immediately.

I've owned 2 of their Beretta clones and 2 of their 1911s - all 4 were acceptable guns but the horrible customer service has convinced me to look at other options...
 
To date I've had 7 Taurus autos. Six Mil Pros and 1 1911. I have had 0 issues with these guns. I know some have had problems with their Taurus. I don't take that to mean that Taurus is sub par. Any manufacturer can produce a faulty gun every now and then.

On a side note I have only had to send back 2 guns. One S&W 908s and 1 Sig P238.
Dallas Jack
 
I've had a few Taurus's and the only ones that really impressed me are the Raging Bulls in the super magnum calibers with double lock cylinders. They seem to be top notch.
Their other guns..........I'll put the money they cost towards the purchase of other brands.
 
I've owned one Taurus - a model 85. It fired about 80% of the time. Not great.

While I wouldn't own another Taurus, there are plenty of folks who have them and have had no problems with them. I'd even go so far as to say that I think the majority of Taurus products function properly. But if you get one that doesn't work, what a headache, because a bigger problem with Taurus than quality control is their abysmal customer service. Turn around time is often measured in months. That's unacceptable by anybody's standards.
 
owning vs shooting

Of the 'majors', they offer the crapshoot.

I guess that's what happens when you introduce so many new models even the catalog can't keep up.

I've owned a Taurus PT22 for over a dozen years (bought it because I met two plainsclothes wearing them as back-ups), and after finding the ammo brand it preferred the gun has worked without fail.

I still wouldn't buy another (latest experience late last year with new revolver that stopped after less than 100 rds fired; no, it wasn't mine. It was a friend's who bought it --for its price-- before I could warn him).
And early last year friend bought an OSS that wasn't very good (laughing as I type that). He sold it before 400 rds fired.
For a loss.
 
They've had QC problems, but I think even the critics can agree that over the years it has gotten steadily better, even if it's not been enough improvement to satisfy them. I have one (PT111) and may get another in the future. I replaced the PT111, but only cause I went over to the darkside and got a Glock. I might get that 738 pocket .380 if they'd ever release it and it's for a good price.
 
Back
Top