Tack driving 22???

Anschütz.

Of course for the budget proposed in the OP, it will be a pretty ugly Anschütz, but that's ok. The most beat-up clunker club-rifle Anschütz will outshoot pretty much anything on the planet.

Good ammo is also important. RWS makes some great stuff that tends to be a bit cheaper than Eley and Lapua.
 
This is 5 shots at 50 yards using Wolf ammo

088.jpg


And this is the rifle that I did it with, not even a bolt action.

086.jpg
 
You might consider taking that $500 or less dollars and make a project out of that old Henry bolt action if the barrel isn't too washed out. You might be surprised at the results of a bedding & trigger job with good ammo.
Plus you might be surprised at how much of that $500 might stay in your pocket. ;)
-Bruce
 
I have a 77/22 and a T-bolt and the T-bolt runs circles around it. 5 shot ragged holes @ 50 yards all day with good ammo.
 
Marlin XT-22 in either .22lr or .22WMR...but I prefer .22 WMR for hunting, as you never know what you'll see in the woods :)
 
For under $500, the CZ 452/455 series shoots the tightest group right out of the box.

At 50 yards, expect to put every bullet within 1/2" with CCI ammo using provided iron sights, which are unquestionably the best sights on the market at that price.

This is for a new gun. Used, get an Anschultz. They will beat a CZ, but it is the only stock gun that will, out of the box.
 
I'm impressed with the .22 Mag CZ 455 I got recently. It loves CCI A-Max 30 grain rounds and stays well within an inch of POA out to 110 yards, with a scope.

I shot it yesterday in some "squirrelly" conditions and it made 1" 5-shot groups at 100 yards. It regularly shoots .4" at 50 yards.

The rifle has been pillar-bedded and the trigger lightened by cutting the return spring.
 
Try different brands of ammo in your rifle, each rifle will have a preference for different ammo. I have also found that the torque on the action screw will affect accuracy of a rifle and you can tune a rifle to a specific ammo by changing the torque. Harbor Freight sells a 1/4" torque wrench for under $20.
Ammo that shoots good for you at 50 yards may not be as good at 100 yards as the bullet my go subsonic on it way to the target. This problem is more prevalent in short barrel rifles such as the 10/22.

A couple of my paper punches
PaperPunches.jpg
 
I'm going to be honest, I wanted something similar to what you want a while back. I decided I wanted a .22 to shoot at 100 yards with. I did lots of reading and talking to friends that had various .22's. I ended up buying a Savage Mark II BTV. It's the one with the heavy bull barrel, the accu trigger, and the thumbhole stock. The trigger had had a few modifications and was even lighter. I absolutely loved the trigger.

Anyone I noticed upon shooting it that with the bulk ammo I'd always shot in .22's, that it didn't shoot any better than anything else I'd shot at 100 yards. I really was disappointed. I then tried at 50 yards and it still didn't shoot that great with bulk ammo. Maybe slightly better than the stock 10/22's I've shot, but it really wasn't much difference. I tried several different brands of ammo and all of the cheap stuff seemed to shoot about the same. It slightly preferred CCI SV ammo of the cheap stuff. It shot them into an inch or so group at 50 yards, but once at 100 yards it just was back to 3" groups or so.

Then I tried Wolf Match ammo and it shot one hole groups like pictured above at 50 yards. I was impressed and thought I'd found the ammo to stick with. It also shot a group similar to that at 65 yards. However, one I moved out to 100 yards, the groups opened back up. They were always in the 1.5-2" range at least. That was decent to me for a .22, but I still wasn't really impressed. With the cheaper ammo though it wasn't anymore accurate than any of the other .22's I have with cheap ammo. So then I tried the match ammo in a friends stock 10/22 that the only modification was a trigger job and it shot very similar. The Mark II might have shot a tad better groups, but not much.

The other issue I noticed with the Mark II is when shooting Wolf Match the lube seemed to gum up the chamber really badly and after shooting 15-20 shots, the fired shells would start sticking in the chamber some. You had to keep the chamber clean of that lube. That I'm sure would happen with any rifle though. The rifle never jammed with any ammo that didn't have a ton of lube on it.

I realized after my experience that it's more in the ammo than the gun.

That being said, I hung onto the Mark II for a while and would shoot it every so often, but every time I took it out I felt let down. I ended up selling it as I found I just didn't use it.


That's not to say that the Mark II isn't a bad rifle at all, it just didn't perform anywhere near as well as I expected after all I'd read about it. I think my expectations were just too high. I much preferred the feel an lightweight of my buddies 10/22 and I also prefer a semi auto, and I felt like I was giving up all of that for the Mark II, and I really didn't gain much if anymore accuracy.

Now if someone was looking for that style rifle in a bolt action, I'd highly recommend it as it was a good rifle, it just wasn't really any more accurate than many of the other rifles out there that aren't bull barrels.

I'd personally just try different ammo in your current guns unless you really want a new rifle.
 
If you've got a 10/22 you've got it made in the shade. The 10/22 is the most upgradable .22 in the world. Take your $500 and upgrade the 10/22.

If you insist on buying another .22 then I would push you towards the CZ 452 but I think given what you've already got you'd be stupid to buy the CZ. Im tellin' ya, upgrade that 10/22. Volquartsen trigger, a stock that tickles your fancy, a bull barrel of your choice. Have a look at some of these, all 10/22's.

Built by Rimfire Technologies

custom-build.jpg


58670.jpg


FrankenRuger.42164837.JPG


Ruger10-22Custom.jpg


http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/pittsburgh.jpg

images


b_c_right.jpg
 
I don't see how you could even shoot that first gun that's camo in your picture. With a scope like that that is that far back, I'd never get a decent cheek weld. I'd have to hold my head way too far back. For the rest of them they look awesome though.
 
A Remington 510 Single Shot I have is very accurate. Fixed sights, though it fires where you point it, and its very accurate.
 
I've seen many recommend the CZ 452 but while i agree its a fine rifle i think the 453 with the set trigger would be superior for your needs. Other then that upgrade the 10/22 savages are nice but CZs have class.
 
"Only Accurate Rifles Are Interesting"

CZ 452 FS w/Leupold FX-1 4x

001.jpg


Savage Mark II BTVSS w/Leupold VX-II 4-12x40mm AO

0612091537.jpg

shootin1-16-091.jpg


USSG Z5 (formerly CZ99, Charles Daly Superior, Remington Model 5) w/ Leupold Vari-X II 2-7 Reworked by the Leupold Custom Shop
Z5-1.jpg

1228091510.jpg
 
Last edited:
Fusion said:
I don't see how you could even shoot that first gun that's camo in your picture. With a scope like that that is that far back, I'd never get a decent cheek weld. I'd have to hold my head way too far back.

I agree. Here's what I did to solve a similar problem on an Anschutz.

Anschutz1502019.jpg

Anschutz1502017.jpg
 
Back
Top