switching calibers

K

kilotanker22

New member
Hello all. New to this forum actually chose this forum because you can Google just about anything to do with guns and get a result from this forum.

So I recently parted with my 300 win may I have owned and used for 7 or 8 years. Recoil is not an issue to me anymore (it was when I first began to shoot). I am probably going to get something smaller. What would you pick and why? By the way this is not a which is better question. Just about any caliber 223 and up is ( good enough for deer sized game). Just looking for some insight.

Really looking at the 270, 270wsm.
 
You looking for a deer and paper puncher?

Do you handload?

243Win
.25-06
7mm-08

Many other options, especially for a handloader but those are my choices. Nothing wrong with .270 or mag versions either.

Welcome to the forum. :)
 
So you're shooting deer. Eastern woods or western mountains? Are you going to try for the big deer (elk and moose)? No one will fault the .270; the wsm flavor is faster with less track record. But since you asked, pick up one of the major brand reloading manuals and read their cartridge descriptions. Not the final word, but generally some good insight. The late Don Lewis, who wrote the gun column for the PA Game News, made the argument that 7mm is the "optimum" bore for a hunting rifle. Just pick your longest shot and match it to case size. Many here, myself included, are liking the 6.5, but there are fewer caliber choices in that bore. By the way, why did you drop the .300 WM?
 
I only dropped the 300 win may to try something different. Since I have owned my 300 I have learned to control recoil and shoot it well. However I think that I may shoot even better with a little less recoil. Average shots will be from 0- 400 yards occasionally longer generally less than 300 yards. Not really for punching paper that's what my 700 varmint 243 with 105 grain a Max is for backed by 38.5 grains of h4350. Bullet seated 40 thousands from the lands and cases only neck sized.
 
Oh. If I had a 243, I'd use that.

If you're more like ;) I need a new gun! ;)
Well, that's ok too.

In that case, I'd go 25-06, since you handload.

But, again, if you want a 270, nothing wrong with it. Fine choice.
 
O believe me it would not be the first deer that this particular 243 has killed. It is however very heavy and a pain to carry. Have never thought about the 25-06 honestly. How does it stand up to the 270 in terms of energy and penetration at medium range.

By the way my dads when he was younger hunted with a 25-06 ( he stopped hunting when his dad passed) dad says a 25-06 to the neck at any range makes very short work of any white tail.
 
By the way definitely looking to buy new rifle. Like to get a new one every few years. Really liking the savage 114 American classic hft.
 
Ah...already has a .243 and reloads. FYI, I have been very pleased with my Sav 116 "Weather Warrior". Can you get the Savage in .280 Remington? Ballistic twin to the .270 and a better bullet selection for the reloader. 7mm-08 is another good choice, but 100+fps slower with 160's. I "replaced" (still have it) a 7mm Rem Mag with a 6.5x55 a few years ago. Unfortunately, few rifles are available in that caliber, but it's a pleasure to shoot and load for, and covers most of my hunting.
 
Also I have considered buying a Remington 700 spa at walmart. They sell them almost 200 dollars cheaper than my local shop, but my local shop says they are factory second rifles. True or false?
 
.270 WIN is versatile, inexpensive and widely available. Will work on Bambi to 1/4 mile if the shooter is up to it.

Makes a good varmit gun with light (90-110 grain) bullets.

7-08 is more efficient, but brass is not as ubiquitous as the .270...
 
If I just wanted a deer rifle I would buy the lightest I could find like a little Kimber in 7mm-08 or whatever short action cartrdge suits your fancy. Perfect for deer.
 
25-06 will do with a 120gr what 243 will do with a 100, more or less. So, 20-25% more energy.

270, 7-08 gets about the same with a 140gr, more or less.

All perfectly capable of killing deer at many hundreds of yards. Certainly 600+ if the shooter is up to it.

It's a personal choice. I don't like recoil. Been forced to hunt with 12ga slugs for many years. I'm over it.

243 is at the top of my "fun" recoil level.
270/7-08 is at the top of my "I want to tolerate it" level.

A deer at 2,3,4,500 yards would never know the difference.

I'm currently converting a Savage 11 in 270WSM to 243AI.
 
jimbob86: Yup. I'd like to Second that. Great advice Sir.

Have a 270 Win and a 25-06 Rem both from same manufacture and same model. 270 is actually a bit more accurate at distance (200 plus.) Owned a Ruger 7mm-08 at one time also. Shot good. Just to noisy for my liking. First fired brass was near extinct to find for it. Just got tired of squeezing 308s down for it. (So, good bye!! down the road with yaw >7mm-08.)
 
Also considered going back to the old fail safe 30-06. I know a killer load with 165 grain sierra game king hollow point boat tails. That consistanly shot. Half moa with my brothers rem 700.
 
I have heard wonderful things about the 6.5 Swede but production rifles chambered for it are almost non existent. Looking in the 500-600 dollar price range plus a three hundred dollar Bushnell elite.
 
270, 7-08 gets about the same with a 140gr, more or less.
Click to expand...

Less. The .270 WIN gives better velocity, and more efficient 140 gr bullets.... the best 7mm bullets are 160gr+, and the best .277 are 150's ....

7-08 is to .308 as .270 WIN is to .30-06: At "normal hunting distances" (300 and under) there is no real difference save that shorter cartridges are more efficient and can be put into slightly shorter (thus lighter rifles)... at greater ranges, bullets of similar weights are more efficient in the smaller calibers..... and bullets of equal BC can be pushed faster (because they are lighter)..... a 150 gr .277 Berger VLD will have a .531 G1 BC and be fine in a 1:10 twist ... a 155 .308 (they don't make a 150) will have a G1 BC of .4 something .... and has a recommended 1:14 twist..... to surpass the efficiency of the .277 150, the 7mm's needs to go heavier..... 160, 165, 168..... and the 7-08, like the .308 parent, lacks the case capacity to push heavy for caliber bullets to the levels the larger -06 sized cases allow .... if you are looking for flat shooting to 1/4 mile, then .270 WIN ..... WINS...... against the 7-08 ....... the 280 Rem and 7 Rem Mag ..... if you are not recoil shy, beat it.

All perfectly capable of killing deer at many hundreds of yards. Certainly 600+ if the shooter is up to it.
Click to expand...

600 yards ..... time of flight comes into play.... are you sure that animal is not going to move in the 3/4 second between the time the brain sez "squeezee..... " and the bullet getting there, even if the shooter can read the wind and figure up/down angle, holdover, etc..... 600 yards is a long long way to be shooting at game, where a 1MOA load and rifle has a 6" margin of error, even if the shooter does his part perfectly....... which, being he is human .......
 
Looking in the 500-600 dollar price range plus a three hundred dollar Bushnell elite.
Click to expand...

Look at the consignment racks ..... there are perfectly good guns out there with good glass already on them, that would leave you 4 or 5 C-notes to spend on components to build the perfect beast(s) at the reloading bench.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top