Off topic reply
Sorry for the off topic reply but the US is different from Britain and presumably Canada. Foremost, the UK has the Common Sense doctrine, the US doesn't. For Americans that don't know it, I've heard that if you stand on top of a ladder, begin to lose your balance, and fall off, it's your fault because Common Sense says.. In the US, you need a sign..
A case that I repeatedly think of is the Squirrel Gun case in California. There, a person who kept his parent's home in pristine condition in memory of them. The house was burglarized. And so, the Defendant put signs up and set up a .22 pointed at the door. This burglar got shot as a result. The burglar ended up owning the house. The point I'm trying to make is that just because the burglar is the bad guy for trespassing and wasn't suppose tobe there stealing, don't assume the court is going to agree with you.
If anyone knows or can show any case law that supports factory ammo use over handloads in self-defense, that would be appreciated.
Sorry for the off topic reply but the US is different from Britain and presumably Canada. Foremost, the UK has the Common Sense doctrine, the US doesn't. For Americans that don't know it, I've heard that if you stand on top of a ladder, begin to lose your balance, and fall off, it's your fault because Common Sense says.. In the US, you need a sign..
A case that I repeatedly think of is the Squirrel Gun case in California. There, a person who kept his parent's home in pristine condition in memory of them. The house was burglarized. And so, the Defendant put signs up and set up a .22 pointed at the door. This burglar got shot as a result. The burglar ended up owning the house. The point I'm trying to make is that just because the burglar is the bad guy for trespassing and wasn't suppose tobe there stealing, don't assume the court is going to agree with you.
If anyone knows or can show any case law that supports factory ammo use over handloads in self-defense, that would be appreciated.