Stopping the Bullets--L.A. Police Panel OKs Background Check on Sales of Ammo

Status
Not open for further replies.

Oatka

New member
Kalifornia is at it again.
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3910271f16e7.htm#1

Los Angeles Daily News (Front Page)

Pushing Los Angeles to the vanguard of the gun control movement, the Police Commission unanimously backed a proposed city ordinance Tuesday to require background checks before people could buy gun ammunition.

City officials estimated the ordinance could cost Los Angeles gun shop owners and other licensed dealers about 75 percent of their ammunition sales, with buyers going to Burbank, Glendale and other nearby cities, where it would be easier to buy bullets.

"Will this stop anyone from getting ammunition? Absolutely not," said Bob Kahn, chief executive officer of B&B Sales of North Hollywood, one, of the largest gun and ammunition suppliers in Southern California.

"They're' grandstanding. How can this work when my competitors anywhere else can sell ammunition without any problems whatsoever? How can this work when it's legal to buy it through the mail ... legal to make your own?"

Councilman Michael Feuer, who first proposed the state's toughest ammunition permit ordinance, insisted public safety should take precedence over other considerations. He argued the background checks are necessary to give meaning to existing state statutes.

"We have state rules that preclude felons and (offenders with) violent misdemeanors from possessing guns and ammunition. But there is currently no system in place to prevent any criminal from walking into (a gun store) and buying bullets right now," said Feuer, a candidate for city attorney.

Feuer added that his office has collaborated with the Los Angeles Police Department, state Attorney General's Office and state Department of Justice to create a simple permit application system that is easy to enforce and implement.

If passed, the ordinance would require consumers to pay a $14 permit fee and submit to a 10-day background check for the right to purchase ammunition.

The City Council has yet to determine whether the $14 permit would be good for two years or would have to be renewed every year.

Police Commissioner Dean Hansell called the background checks "another important step to help make this city a little safer."

The state Department of Justice has agreed to complete the ammunition background checks for the city, using nearly the same criteria the state now uses for permits to buy guns. The only information that could not be accessed for ammunition background checks would be a buyer's mental health records.

If a customer wanted authorization to buy a gun and ammunition at the same time, he or she could use the same background check for both and would only have to pay one $14 fee.

To conduct the ammunition background checks, the state would need to upgrade the gun permit computer system at a cost of about $380,000. In addition, there would be a yearly cost of about $120,000 for the workers who perform the checks.

Feuer expressed hope that the state would agree to pick up the tab.

Based upon law enforcement estimates, about 40,000 consumers purchase ammunition e ach year at gun shops and other licensed dealers in Los Angeles. The number would plunge to about 10,000 if the ordinance were adopted, according to official preliminary estimates.

"Most persons would likely purchase their ammunition from gun dealers outside of the city limits or through mail order companies, neither of which would be affected by the ordinance," city policy analyst Bill Statti noted in a March report.

The city has no means to track how much money it took in last year on taxes from ammunition sales. Attempts by the city to create a special tax on ammunition were invalidated in, 1998 by Proposition 218, tax and permit officials said.

Feuer and Hansell expressed hope that tougher ammunition laws in Los Angeles would serve as a catalyst for other cities, the state and the nation. Both noted San Francisco recently began considering a similar proposal at the city and county levels.

"There is a lot of interest in this from other cities," Hansell said. "We anticipate that Glendale, Burbank, Pasadena and other cities would be very interested in what we are doing. Those cities have the identical goal of keeping the streets safe."

The City Council's Public Safety Committee is scheduled to discuss the ordinance May 15.

It's a foolish idea," said Merrill Gibson, president of the National Rifle Association Member Council of Westside Los Angeles.

"I suppose it's supposed to have some sort of crime-fighting use. Generally speaking, criminals do not have a need to replenish their guns. When they use a gun they seldom fire it, they use it as a threat."

Merrill said the only people who do use "vast quantities of ammunition" are law-abiding target shooters.

"This is an enormous waste of resources and does nothing to stop criminals from getting ammunition," he said. "It only makes it a little harder for law-abiding citizens to get ammunition."




------------------
The New World Order has a Third Reich odor.
 
Next step will be a ban on mail order ammo, "to close the loophole".

------------------
I don't have time for busy people
 
Bob Kahn, chief executive officer of B&B Sales of North Hollywood, one,
of the largest gun and ammunition suppliers in Southern California.


This is the outfit that allowed the police to come in and borrow new inventory(guns and ammo) and shoot it out with the big N. Hollywood bank robbers 2 yrs ago. Now the city wants to destroy his business.

------------------
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes" RKBA!
 
My only surprise is that it took this long for it to happen. I am not in the least bit surprised that the city would turn on the guys who helped save their bacon. Governments by nature are thankless entities. What they swa was that a private individual could do more to help the community than they could. Petty jealosy. As I have stated all laong. Each and every gun dealer, distributor, gunsmith... should band together and never sell anything to any LEO EVER. See how long the political princes would last.

------------------
"Liberty is never unalienable; it must be redeemed regularly with the blood of patriots or it always vanishes."
-R.A. Heinlein
 
Just means criminals will now have an extra source of revenue - selling ammo to other criminals. Way to go LA! Keep this up and sooner or later all the dangerous criminals there will be able to retire!
 
Wasn't something like this done at the federal level some 15 or 20 years ago?

If I recall, it was dropped as it had no effect on crime at all and was deemed a waste of time.

Possibly someone elses memory is better than mine.

Regards
 
"Police Commissioner Dean Hansell called the background checks 'another important step to help make this city a little safer.'"

Yes, they're all just 'steps', aren't they? One by one, to infringe our rights ... er, I mean close those loopholes.

It wasn't that long ago that LA was considering a ban on reloading equipment and supplies ... where did that end up?

Buy guns. Buy ammunition. Do it ... for your children. ;)

Regards from AZ
 
Bunkster:

Yes, about 10 to 20 years ago one had to sign in order to purchase ammo, at least here in CA. There was no background check, but you had to sign a statement that you could legally purchase it and your sig was recorded in their little black book.



------------------
Richard

The debate is not about guns,
but rather who has the ultimate power to rule,
the People or Government.
RKBA!
 
"Police Commissioner Dean Hansell called the background checks 'another important step
to help make this city a little safer."

How about getting rid of all the corruption in the LAPD, wouldn't this help the city to become a little safer? Arrogant SOB! Of course the government will be exempt from such an ordinance.

------------------
"Gun Control is Only to Protect Those in Power"
 
If passed, the ordinance would require consumers to pay a $14 permit fee and submit to a 10-day background check for the right to purchase ammunition.

What's wrong with this sentence? Clue: it ain't sentence structure...

The only information that could not be accessed for ammunition background checks would be a buyer's mental health records.

Of course! Everyone with just a half a brain knows that they're not the problem at all. Hinckley was the victim!

Feuer expressed hope that the state would agree to pick up the tab.

Ah yes, the state; that bastion of free enterprise; that keeper of the flame of freedom; that benevolent private enterprise!

------------------
Gun Control: The proposition that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her own panty hose, is more acceptable than allowing that same woman to defend herself with a firearm.


[This message has been edited by jimpeel (edited May 03, 2000).]

[This message has been edited by jimpeel (edited May 03, 2000).]
 
If they want the city to be a little safer why don't they try this: The next time there is a riot try driving into the area instead of out of it!

------------------
Gun Control: The proposition that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her own panty hose, is more acceptable than allowing that same woman to defend herself with a firearm.
 
Bookie
Same here in AZ you had to fill out a line in a log book. Quit doing it sometime in the late 70's early 80's if i recall.

7
 
It's not exactly a surprise, is it? And the fact that LA started it, is another non-surprise.

One gun a month; one thousand rounds a month.
 
Having to show a driver's license and sign a book for ammo purchases was one of the provisions of the Gun Control Act of 1968 so it was a requirement nationwide. The requirement was abolished in the late '80s because the FBI said it was a burden on merchants and had no effect on crime rates.
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by TMoney:
One gun a month; one thousand rounds a month.[/quote]

If we're lucky. Most cops i know shoot less than 100 rnds a year, much less a month. They couldn't imagin needing more than a few rounds a month.

It would be more like, "request for purchase of 1 gun a month (may be denied) and not more than 100 rnds per caliber per month..."

I'm all for firing the LAPD, they have proven that they are harmful to the general public...

~USP
 
Taz,
"never sell anything to any LEO EVER"

I'm assuming you mean not sell to government agencies and not to refuse sales to individual LEOs.

Keep in mind guys the Police Commission in LA are civilians not members of LAPD (I am assuming liberal idiots).

In regards to LAPD scandals, that only represents a small fraction of there department, not all officers. I know they have problem officers (I had training with one once and he was a pompous a$$) but lets not condem the entire department.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top