In response to Double Naught Spy's questioning mind...
1. Direct head shot is exactly as you described - a non-glancing shot which, give the shape and relative thickness of the heads of some liberals, might be difficult to do.
2. "Brain Pan" refers to the skull volume. And "completely disrupts" means a hit which is violent enough to severely damage the brain. Some .357Mag rounds will exit at high speed, creating a vaccuum that pulls material along from inside the crainium. Any shot that scrambles the mudella (sp?) (motor cortex) or disrupts the connection between the brain and mudella.
Double Naught Spy said:What is the difference between a direct shot to the head versus and indirect shot to the head? Are you talking about penetrating versus glancing?
Head shots are not as great as you make them out to be. First of all, just what function does the "brain pan" perform? If you are talking about the skull itself, holding the brain, its disruption does not guarentee anything as people can suffer a lot of cranial trauma and still function.
Next, just because a person is shot in the head does not mean there will be any cessation of activities. There is a lot of head volume that can suffer severe trauma without cessation of activities. Facial shots are classic examples.
1. Direct head shot is exactly as you described - a non-glancing shot which, give the shape and relative thickness of the heads of some liberals, might be difficult to do.
2. "Brain Pan" refers to the skull volume. And "completely disrupts" means a hit which is violent enough to severely damage the brain. Some .357Mag rounds will exit at high speed, creating a vaccuum that pulls material along from inside the crainium. Any shot that scrambles the mudella (sp?) (motor cortex) or disrupts the connection between the brain and mudella.