I dunno...
I do like em a lot. Seems like a sound desgin w lottsa promise. Haven't read any bad about em in the gunzines, but what do ya expect? Some names I trust (Johnston, Wilson, Huntington, Ayoob, Petty, Rauch) said very good things about them though.
Still...
Had 2 HS2000s, and have 2 XD-9s. I've shot 6 different XD-9s and 3 different XD-40s. Some of them had trouble w FTE (failures to extract) and FTF (feed). If Gun Tests had shot those, woulda been ugly? Have heard of other XD-s that worked OK for a few hundred, even a few thousand rounds, then started to have the same problems. Kinda odd? Usually a gun starts out rough and smooths out, not the other way 'round?
The 9 and 40 seemed pretty much identical as far as slide/spring weights too. Means the 9 is over-engineered and one tough cookie, or the 40 is on the edge?
Ya never can tell until a few thousand folks start messing with them, a few agencies do some objective T&Es and get em in service? Gonna be a few yrs before we know for sure? After all, the Glock failed the DEA test in 92 and had several parts "upgraded", 10 yrs after it came out and had already been NATO approved!
Ya would think after the Steyr, some folks would learn?