rt11002003
New member
Finally! I'm logged in.
Took my new, unfired (except at factory?) Sphinx SDP Compact to the range on Friday, along with a HK 9mm Tactical. I've carried the Tactical for my last several trips; I've had difficulty firing a good pattern with it.
Anyway, the first five rounds from the SDP failed to load and to lock the slide back when mag was empty. In the second group, a couple more rounds failed to load; then it cleared up, loaded correctly, but the slide still wouldn't lock back. At round 15, the slide locked back when empty. The gun continued to cycle flawlessly for the remaining 75 rounds. That gun was tight!
Now to accuracy, I was lousy for about 10 rounds. At that point I settled down and started improving. At rounds 40 to 45, the four of the five were in a two inch group at 10 yards. I'm convinced; it's a great gun. Thanks guys for bring it to my attention! I'll try to post a photo of the target.
As to the HK, the trigger is heavier than the SDP. The SDP was smooth, broke cleanly at about 4 pounds. I have a HK Mark 23 with a trigger break around 7-8 pounds. The Tactical trigger pull is close to the Mark 23. It has caused me to shoot low and left. I don't have that issue with the Mark 23. I'm guessing my supporting the additional weight and heft of the Mark 23 sets me up to ignore the heavier trigger. ????? My comments are about SA trigger pull.
Quality evaluation will come later as I get more familiar with the SDP.
Conclusion: We should all have a SDP Compact. And, I'm in the market for the Sphinx Production Black Line 9mm SA/DA SDP, if it comes to market. b/t/w, the literature says it has a manual safety, the picture agrees; but, the specs say it has decocking. Go figure.!
I was also carrying a Ruger Mark iii Competition Target in which I had just finished installing a Volquartsen trigger and hammer kit. Can't say enough about the kit. Makes that gun a whole new ball game.
Took my new, unfired (except at factory?) Sphinx SDP Compact to the range on Friday, along with a HK 9mm Tactical. I've carried the Tactical for my last several trips; I've had difficulty firing a good pattern with it.
Anyway, the first five rounds from the SDP failed to load and to lock the slide back when mag was empty. In the second group, a couple more rounds failed to load; then it cleared up, loaded correctly, but the slide still wouldn't lock back. At round 15, the slide locked back when empty. The gun continued to cycle flawlessly for the remaining 75 rounds. That gun was tight!
Now to accuracy, I was lousy for about 10 rounds. At that point I settled down and started improving. At rounds 40 to 45, the four of the five were in a two inch group at 10 yards. I'm convinced; it's a great gun. Thanks guys for bring it to my attention! I'll try to post a photo of the target.
As to the HK, the trigger is heavier than the SDP. The SDP was smooth, broke cleanly at about 4 pounds. I have a HK Mark 23 with a trigger break around 7-8 pounds. The Tactical trigger pull is close to the Mark 23. It has caused me to shoot low and left. I don't have that issue with the Mark 23. I'm guessing my supporting the additional weight and heft of the Mark 23 sets me up to ignore the heavier trigger. ????? My comments are about SA trigger pull.
Quality evaluation will come later as I get more familiar with the SDP.
Conclusion: We should all have a SDP Compact. And, I'm in the market for the Sphinx Production Black Line 9mm SA/DA SDP, if it comes to market. b/t/w, the literature says it has a manual safety, the picture agrees; but, the specs say it has decocking. Go figure.!
I was also carrying a Ruger Mark iii Competition Target in which I had just finished installing a Volquartsen trigger and hammer kit. Can't say enough about the kit. Makes that gun a whole new ball game.
Last edited: