OldMarksman
Staff
Posted by zombietactics:
There are so many, inf fact, that the only time I will intervene on behalf of a third party is when I know that third party very well and when it is crystal clear what is happening. Not very apparent, but crystal clear.
Rob Pincus happened to put out the following to today.
This timely article is worth reading, slowly and more than one.
Alrighty then. I think that in general, believing that one will be able to tell when intervention is "good and moral" is very unrealistic and extremely naive.PLEASE judge, the world needs more (good) judgement, and we need to get used to - once again - recognizing good judgement vs, bad judgement.
More accurately, there are countless possibilities.There are countless "what if"s which can imagined on any side of any question.
There are so many, inf fact, that the only time I will intervene on behalf of a third party is when I know that third party very well and when it is crystal clear what is happening. Not very apparent, but crystal clear.
"What ifs" are the very basis of sound risk management.However, I do believe that "what if" is seldom the basis of good judgement.
Rob Pincus happened to put out the following to today.
This timely article is worth reading, slowly and more than one.