ellsworthtoohey
New member
Banzai, how would you discover said firearm prior to conducting a search? If the individual refuses a search, you must then either have probable cause, or a warrant to conduct a search. Those are well established principles of criminal legal proceedure. Anything less is intimidation in an attempt to obtain consent. This intimidation doesn't end with lawenforcement either. I would suggest that any "convictions" that actually exist in such situations (no probable cause, no consent, & no warrant), are the result of plea bargains instead of jury trials. I will conceed that the rights of military personnel may differ from those of free citizens of the Republic.
For Federal Bureau of Prisons policy on the subject see: www.bop.gov/ , then click on FOIA/Policy, then "5000 Inmate and Custodial Management," then 5510.09 Searching and Detaining or Arresting Persons Other Than Inmates. Section 9 talks about the right of a non inmate to refuse a search unless their is reason to arrest or detain; based on probable cause of course, since the mere presence of an individual on federal property, or about to enter federal property, is not a legal reason to search them without their consent. If it were, it would apply to all federal property to include national forests and BLM lands. The only legal leverage that the government has over an individual on governmnet property is the same as that of any other property owner. That is the right to set the conditions in which a person may enter or remain on the property. If the person refuses to abide by the conditions, then the person may be removed, forcibly if necessary. This is not a police power however, it is a property right; a distinction that is often confused when the government owns property.
[This message has been edited by ellsworthtoohey (edited March 05, 2000).]
For Federal Bureau of Prisons policy on the subject see: www.bop.gov/ , then click on FOIA/Policy, then "5000 Inmate and Custodial Management," then 5510.09 Searching and Detaining or Arresting Persons Other Than Inmates. Section 9 talks about the right of a non inmate to refuse a search unless their is reason to arrest or detain; based on probable cause of course, since the mere presence of an individual on federal property, or about to enter federal property, is not a legal reason to search them without their consent. If it were, it would apply to all federal property to include national forests and BLM lands. The only legal leverage that the government has over an individual on governmnet property is the same as that of any other property owner. That is the right to set the conditions in which a person may enter or remain on the property. If the person refuses to abide by the conditions, then the person may be removed, forcibly if necessary. This is not a police power however, it is a property right; a distinction that is often confused when the government owns property.
[This message has been edited by ellsworthtoohey (edited March 05, 2000).]