SMLE Mk III* info

good thread but worth reviving-the No.4 Mk.1 is stronger than the No.1 Mk.III

yes, there was a 308 conversion kit available in the UK back in the 1960's, for the No.4 and No.5

the SMLE rifles have a fast, short throw bolt, and large 10 round clip, but from the strength/accuracy standpoint, leave much to be desired.

1. the stock is 2 piece, not conducive to accuracy- at one time there were custom 1-piece SMLE stocks available, that covered the steel butt socket- but that was a long time ago 1960's.

2. the fore end is a loose fit on the barreled action, you can grab the barrel and move it all around in the stock- a complete 'glas bedding is required, otherwise the guns suffer from a "wandering zero"- will shoot high to the left progressively more, as the barrel gets hots and moves

3. the bolt is a rear locking lug design, similar to a Remington 788, or lever action Winchester, Marlin, Savage- it is weaker than the Mauser front locking design. The top locking lug on an SMLE actually locks into the rear receiver bridge area-this design is prone to bolt and locking lug compression with successive firings, creating excessive headspace. This is why No. 4 guns had (4) different bolt heads to adjust headspace, numbered 0-1-2-3. A Mauser locks into the receiver ring collar and is much stronger. SMLE chambers are also on the loose side, actually very sloppy.

4. The SMLE is an ancient design, Lee originally started the prototype in 1879. By 1910 the Brits were already considering a Mauser type action to replace it, which led to the Enfield Pattern 14 and Pattern 17 rifles. They stayed with the SMLE because it got the job done, and they were already tooled up for it.

5. the 303 is a rimmed cartridge, an 1800's headspacing method which is generally inferior to a nonrimmed cartridge that headspaces on the shoulder angle, like the 30-06 family

the best you could do with an SMLE is 'glas bed the fore end, and have the barrel turned back 1-2 threads, then rechambered so the chamber is tight clearance on the shell. Start with a "0" bolt head, so you can adjust in the future with the "1-2-3" bolt heads, .006" at a time as the headspace opens up over time. Have the muzzle recrowned. If you are crafty enough, make a new one piece stock- find a vintage one piece stock- or buy an aftermarket synthetic 2-piece stock. Another possibility is rechamber it to 244, 257, or 264 wildcat on the 303 case. The 24-25-26 cal. wildcats would pick up some free velocity due to the lighter bullet weight, and flatten the trajectory.

The SMLE shares the same limitations as the Remington 788 with its rear locking lugs. Not as strong as a front locking bolt, but not quite as weak as a lever action w/rear locking bolt/breech. Let's face it, the 303 cartridge and SMLE action is an ancient design from the 1800's blackpowder era.

having said all this, I own 3 of them, and like the guns. there's much to be said for the 10 round removable magazine and high rate of fire- under 200 yards they worked as good, or better, than any. They are not a 500-1000 yard sniper rifle platform, not without a LOT of work.
 
Last edited:
.303 is a perfectly good hunting round. Sellier&Bellot put out good commercial loads for about $15 a box. The Prvi Partisan is great. If you find Hansen ammo at a show for a good price, buy it, it's really Prvi Partisan.

The .303 went out of service a while ago, most of the surplus ammo is not really worth it, in my opinion. The last batch I saw that I would buy was South African from the 1960's and that was years ago.

Friend of mine loads my .303 now, I bought the dies and everything else, he does the rest, if you can find a buddy with a press, try that route.
 
Russian ammo is not interchangeable with .303 British.

I think he may have been referring to some of the .303 ammo that is manufactured in Serbia. (Prvi Partizan.) Apparently, they have just entered into a business agreement with the Russian "Wolf" ammo company.
 
Do you guys know much about the .308 conversions? Solid jobs, or crap?

I respect the classic rifles, but don't really care about having a pristine piece of history, so I'd love to have an SMLE that could shoot the cheaper and more easily attainable .308 (blasphemy or not).

The only No. 1 Mk III based rifles in .308 are the Ishapore produced 2A and 2A1 rifles. The Indians dealt with the increased pressures of the 7.62 NATO standard round by manufacturing new receivers from a much higher grade of steel than that used on the old British and Australian made guns. It's still not recommended to shoot higher pressure commercial .308 sporting ammo in them, however. The Ishapore made rifles are still available at reasonable prices, and my experience with them (I have several) is that they are quite accurate if they have good bores.

The No. 4 rifles are a different matter however; Many were converted by the British to 7.62 NATO and placed into reserve stores. The No. 4 also served to be converted into excellent target rifles and was actually the last of the Lee-Enfields to serve in the British military in the role of the L42 sniper rifle. It was declared obsolescent in 1992. Unlike the Indian made 2As, however, they have become ungodly expensve.

To be honest, the only surplus .308 on the market right now seems to be POF Pakistani garbage, while quality .303 is more or less readily available.
 
Last edited:
You meant the opposite right? Garbage POF .303

No, as of late, there is some POF .308 (7.62) being offered (as well as Indian), neither of which I would touch with a ten foot pole. The Aussie .308, the British Radway Green, and the Portuguese stuff have all dried up, and American stuff is pretty expensive.

It goes without saying that the POF .303 is even worse garbage, and some outlets have stopped selling it because it's so bad.
 
No kidding? I had no idea. I reload all my .308 and .303 now so I haven't kept up with the surplus situation. I've got about 700 rounds of the POF .303 and you're right, it's awful. I bought it a while ago so I got it quite cheap, but almost every round is a hangfire. Eventually they all go off, but it's an interesting experience to say the least...
 
L42A1

http://world.guns.ru/sniper/sn44-e.htm

Enfield L39A1, L42A1 and Enforcer (Great Britain)
Enfield L42A1 military sniper rifle
Enfield "Enforcer" police sniper rifle

Caliber(s): 7.62mm NATO (.308Win)
Operation: manual, rotating bolt
Barrel: 700 mm
Weight: 4.42 kg
Length: 1180 mm
Feed Mechanism: 10 rounds detachable box magazine

After the adoption of the 7.62x51mm round as the NATO standard rifle round in 1950s, British Royal Small Arms Factory (RSAF) at Enfield Lock developed a conversion for many surpulus .303 British caliber Lee-Enfield SMLE No.4 rifles. The conversion included new, heavy barrel, chambered for 7.62mm NATO ammunition, shortened forend and handguard. This conversion was intended for competitive shooting. The civilian version had been known as Enfield "Envoy" match rifle, military target rifle was designated as L39A1. Both versions fetaured ajustable open sights.

Later, with the addition of the scope mounting bracket to the left side of the receiver, the L39A1 became the L42A1 military sniper rifle.

Early in the 1970, RSAF developed a police version of the L42A1, called "Enforcer". It differed from L42 by having more sporterised buttstock with semi-pistol grip and integral cheeckpiece. It also used match type open sights and commercial telescopic sights.

Production of the "Enforcer" and L42 rifles ceased circa 1985, and it was replaced in military service by Accuraly Intl. L96A1 rifle.

attachment.php


attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • l42a1.jpg
    l42a1.jpg
    12.5 KB · Views: 281
  • enforcer.jpg
    enforcer.jpg
    13 KB · Views: 283
Last edited:
With all due respect ...


1. the stock is 2 piece, not conducive to accuracy- .

Nonsense ... the trouble is that most people, outside the Commonwealth Nations who carried the SMLE in battle, know nothing of the rifle or how to properly set it up and accurize it. The Enfield rifle has been used in Military target rifle competition such as Fullbore, since the early 1920's!

All of the 1000 yard records are still held by Enfields at Bisley to this very day. Perhaps a word from the late great Gale McMillan needs to be read yet again.

A few years ago I was invited to build a rifle for the 1000 yard matches in England. The only requirement was that it would be able to beat a Lee Enfield. What a joke! Since my rifles held all the 1000 yard records at the time I felt confident when I told them if I didn't beat every Enfield on the line they wouldn't have to pay for the rifle.

I should have checked the record book before shooting off my mouth . It would have saved me a rifle. There is something very unique to the Enfield that has been explained to me and I still don't understand exactly what it is. It has to do with the two piece stock and the harmonics plus the flex of the joint makes every thing come together at 1000 yards.

You Lee Enfield lovers check the records of the 1000yard matches at Bisley. It will lift your spirits so high you will be able to laugh at us Magnum shooters. Don't ask me how a rifle with a 300 foot mid range trajectory can consistently beat out our high scoring Mags.

Gale McMillan



2. the fore end is a loose fit on the barreled action, you can grab the barrel and move it all around in the stock- a complete 'glas bedding is required, otherwise the guns suffer from a "wandering zero"- will shoot high to the left progressively more, as the barrel gets hots and moves


Again, nonsense ...

The ONLY Enfield rifle that ever had a reputation for wandering zero ( And overblown ) was the No5 Mk1 - the reasons for this have been addressed by me elsewhere in this forum but essentially the issue was due to environmental effects upon the stocking up.

I have quite a broad selection of Enfield rifles and they show no signs of wandering zero or walking the target when hot. The Enfield barrel was supposed to float free in the bedding, forward of the barrel reinforce, and originally there was to only be 7-8 lbs of upward pressure at the muzzle. The action body was held tight in the fore-end by the tight fitting of the sear lugs to the draws - over time if the furniture was not oiled the wood would shrink and THIS could lead to the action not fitting tight in the fore-end. Knowing and understanding the problems and what causes them is 90% of the battle - picking up a 50-80 year old Battle rifle and assuming it was recently serviced as per British REME standards is assuming a lot! If you don't know how to service and accurize the rifle, don't blame the rifle.

A correctly set up and accurized Enfield is accurate to 1MOA and better out to 1000 yards. Anybody claiming an Enfield lacks accuracy clearly lacks the know how to set one up. Blame the workman, not the tools.

Tiki.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top