greatest battle rifle
C'mon now, what would George Patton say?
Note that the SKS is nearly as long and heavy as a Garand, yet fires a cartridge with only about half the range and penetrating power. To be truly lightweight and handy, the SKS needs to be about the size and weight of the M1 carbine, which it is not. (aside: a Mini30 is). I don't see the SKS 10 rd box has any practical advantage over the Garand's 8 rd enbloc. Partially loaded? Bang off what's left at the enemy and stuff in a fresh 8 rd clip. The deadly M1 ping signaling empty? I don't buy it Accuracy.....not many SKS rifles at Camp Perry.
The SKS was obsolete with the adoption of the AK, and it left front line service with the Russians at about the same time. The SKS was essentially a stop gap and fall back design while the AK went through it's birthing process. Not only did the 10 rd box put it behind the AK, but so to the capability for selective/automatic fire. Comrad has been big on that for a long time, remember all those PPsh's in WWII? And the AK is shorter, and arguably lighter.
Durable, reliable, and acceptably accurate, ....I'll buy that. When they were under $100 bucks, and a case of import ammo about the same price if not less, they were a deal and I can remember armloads of them going out gunshow doors. Guys like'em, as the OP and numerous posts have stated.
But the AK, and the Garand for that matter, outclasses the stopgap carbine (that is rifle size) from comrad Simonov.