Skin color is regional adaptation, scientists say

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jffal

New member
Interesting report. If confirmable, it wont come as a complete suprise to me.

Though not directly connected to the right to bear arms, the anxiety over skin shading has been exploited thoughout the United States for various reasons, including the wish to deprive certain otherwise law abiding people of their means to self defense.

It would be ironic if so much of this ethnic strife arose from a mere environmental adaption.
Jeff


sacbee: Cal Report
Address:http://www.sacbee.com/news/calreport/calrep_story.cgi?N112.HTML

Skin color is regional adaptation, scientists say
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- Two San Francisco scientists using data from a NASA satellite say they have discovered why people come in different colors.
Variations in human skin color are the result of adaptations to the amount of ultraviolet light from the sun falling on different regions of Earth, according to Nina Jablonski and George Chaplin, scientists with the California Academy of Science.
People's bodies change their skin color over time to let in just the right amount of UV light, which is key to having healthy babies.
UV light affects the skin's production of folate, part of the B vitamin complex, and vitamin D-3, both of which are essential for having healthy children.
Folate is necessary for the proper development of the nervous system in fetuses and for sperm production in adult males. Vitamin D-3 helps build and maintain strong bones and a healthy immune system.
But too much solar UV light can not only cause skin cancer, it can also damage those chemicals, thereby hurting a person's chances for reproductive success.
The scientists' finding may also explain why women tend to be lighter-skinned than men. Lighter skin lets in more solar UV light, increasing a woman's vitamin D-3 production, which helps the fetus grow during pregnancy and helps nourish newborns through breast feeding.
UV light from the sun varies from region to region for reasons including latitude, humidity and cloudiness.
Jablonski and Chaplin's discovery isn't entirely new. For a long time, scientists have thought there was a correlation between UV light and skin color, and they knew the light helped produce vitamin D and that it could cause cancer.
"But this explanation was considered weak by some scientists because skin cancer has little or no effect on people's ability to reproduce, which is really the bottom line of every evolutionary spreadsheet," Jablonski said.
Jablonski developed the hypothesis that links UV light to reproduction in 1991. The scientists analyzed published measurements of human skin color from around the world and data from NASA's Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer satellite, which orbited Earth from 1978 to 1993 and gathered direct UV measurements for the entire globe, to find the correlation between skin color and UV light.
Jablonski and Chaplin found that dark skin acts as a natural sunscreen to help prevent UV light from breaking down folate, so it is helpful in areas with a lot of sun. But in less sunny areas, dark skin screens out too much sunlight, and can inhibit the production of vitamin D-3, so lighter skin is helpful for reproductive success.
Skin color is based on the level of melanin, an organic molecule with an undetermined chemical structure. Those with more melanin have darker skin, and melanin levels are genetic. But the variations in skin color are adaptations to solar UV light, not biological differences among people, according to Jablonski and Chaplin.
"We're all the same under the skin," Jablonski said.
 
I've always wondered about that. It seems pretty obvious to me that the closer one lives to the equator, the more benefit one would derive from dark skin.
I remember something from an anthropology course I took about 20 years ago. (Details are fuzzy, but the main point isn't.)
Sickle cell anemia is restricted to the black population, and is cause by an abnormal mutation to one type of blood cell. If the mutation is "normal", however (as it is in something like 80+% of the black population,) the effect it has is to help provide a natural immunity to malaria.

------------------
Shoot straight & make big holes, regards, Richard at The Shottist's Center
 
I have been saying this for years.. Not scientificly of course. Just in general conversation. Of course I also point out that Jesus would have had Dark Skin as well. Chances are he was not white..

ANd let me tell you when you point this fact out to a WHite Supremist who also claims to be christian, it really pisses them off. I love it.
 
That's the truth. I went to see "Jeus, Christ Superstar" on stage many years ago.

The guy playing Jesus was black and a good singer, etc. In back of me, there was a big blonde dude having a major fit.

Jesus probably looked like a cross between
Menachim Begin and Anwar Sadat.

Some folks' view of Christianity is just a tribal symbol and has no relation to the religion.
 
"But the variations in skin color are adaptations to solar UV light, not biological differences among people . . ."
To my knowledge, things don't adapt, but certain portions of populations are weeded out that don't already have the biological stuff that makes them more suitable for the conditions.
 
Now wait a minute, my wife is dark, but now she leaves in an area where most are light. Now how come my wife isn't any lighter than before? :D

------------------
"Gun Control is Only to Protect Those in Power"
 
Years ago I read a paper that said that if you mapped the earth in concentric circles centered on the biblical area of the Garden of Paradise, the farther you got from the center the lighter skinned the natives would be.
The Garden of Paradise was located between the Tigris and Euphraties rivers which today would be in Iraq. The Scandinavian people would be the lightest.

But then, this does not account for different races, only different shades.

As an old friend once said, "The average man don't know a hell of a lot"

------------------
You have to be there when it's all over. Otherwise you can't say "I told you so."

Better days to be,

Ed
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by EnochGale:

Jesus probably looked like a cross between
Menachim Begin and Anwar Sadat.
[/quote]

True that. My uncle, who is not Christian but respects the teachings of Jesus nonetheless, has a lovely framed print of Jesus on his living room wall. He likes it because it portrays Jesus as looking a lot like our people...Lebanese. Dark eyes, dark hair, olive skin and a really great nose.


------------------
*quack*

[This message has been edited by duck hunt (edited August 27, 2000).]
 
I personally think there's other adaptations going on regarding ability to deal with hot or cold temperatures. Wider builds and a "layer of blubber" effect is typical of the most cold-adapted people anywhere, the Inuits. Running in the number 2 position for cold-tolerant would be a toss-up between some of the Scandinavians and my own folk, the northern Gaelic, of which I think I'm around 70% or so.

I managed to drive a motorcycle in a light snowstorm at 10deg. F doing 80mph trying to get down out of it :). But if it hits 80deg. F outside, I'm not happy...at 100 I wanna die :D. At 65-70deg F I'm a happy camper.

The *lack* of that "insulating fat" content may partially explain all the black athletes.

Anyhow...none of this affects thinking in any way :). It can lead to some funny moments though...I once worked with a guy recently arrived from India, nice guy but he seemed a little...standoff-ish. Nothing I could really put my finger on. After about a week, he finally, hesitantly asked about my "skin disease", which was the first I'd heard of it.

He'd never seen a freckle! And I got *lots*... :D. We both damn near died laughing once I explained...

Jim
 
Hasn't this all been common knowledge for years? And now two NASA scientists are claiming to have "discovered" the reason? Please.
 
Jeff, CA: Well, yeah, since at least fifty years ago that I know of.

Somebody oughta tell these guys to look up the word melanin, and its relationship to the environmental conditions common to various skin colors.

Ah, well, one of these days somebody might invent a round wheel...

Art
 
I heard Santa Claus wasn't white either. :rolleyes:

------------------
God, Guns and Guts made this country a great country!

oberkommando sez:
"We lost the first and third and now they are after the Second!(no pun intended)"
 
Consider the case of Eskimos. Very cold, in some cases only sunny six monthes out of a year, yet they have dark skin tones. They don't fit in with this theory.
 
The Eskimos live in a place with lots of UV, both direct exposure and reflected (off snow, etc.) It seems to follow that they'd have dark skin.

Later,
Chris

------------------
"TV what do I see, tell me who to believe, what's the use of autonomy when a button does it all??" - Incubus, Idiot Box
 
Perhaps more to the point, Eskimos eat a diet high in vitamin D from fish, and the ONLY advantage to light skin is the ability to make vitamin D in low light levels. Other than that, it's a real hazard, skin cancer, sunburn, vitamin D poisoning...

------------------
Sic semper tyrannis!
 
The only parts of the Eskimo that would be exposed to UV, direct or otherwise would be face and hands. A majority of the time most of their body would be covered. And while it is true that light skin does allow the body to absorb UV and produce vitamin D, it is not true that a diet high in Vitamin D causes dark skin. It has also been noted that if the "dark skin as an adaptation" argument were true, it stands to reason that you would see more cases of skin cancer in light skinned people groups than in dark skinned people groups.
 
As a member of the white-skinned with skin cancer group, I think you DO generally see more skin cancers among the light skinned. Why? Because we're a lot more prone to burning.

But no one is immune from skin cancer.

As for the Inuit, their ancestry is in central Asia, no? And aren't people darker in central Asia?

The Inuit have probably been where they are for no more than 40,000 years.

The stuff we're talking about has probably taken hundreds of thousands of years to develop.

As for Jesus not being lilly white, two things...

Anyone ever read the Autobiography of Malcolm X? Incredible book. In it he discusses confronting a prison preacher about his picture of Jesus, and the biblical descriptions of Jesus.

Years ago I went to an AME (African Methodist Episcopal)church with friends. They had a picture of a black Jesus.

After the service, the minister (about 450 years old, but an INCREDIBLY dynamic speaker, no wonder his congregation was nearly 1,000 members) asked me what I thought of it. My reply tickled him to death... "Isn't Jesus all things to all people?"

------------------
Beware the man with the S&W .357 Mag.
Chances are he knows how to use it.
 
Interestipating indeed.

Guess that explains why the folks who traditionaly dwelled in the perpetual shade of the deep forest areas were so light skinned regardless of latitude.

Oops, that comes out downside up.

Zebras are just confused equines and it is communicable.

Sam...I think.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top